I dont know what the big deal is about wikipedia containing false information.. FFS its the internet.. its not the only site that has false information, and people bitching about a 0.1% statistic.. c'mon.. thats just stupid.. does people not got anything better to do other than complain about BS like this? im sure you can find things in websters that isn't 100% fact if you look hard enough.. or at least some of you ppl would try to dispute it.. things like this irritate me.. keep it off slashdot!
#debian relates to this matter, how? I don't think it does.. and for that matter I have been in #debian for several years. Guess im waiting to get squashed for supporting both easyubuntu and automatix on ubuntu.. oh well its still crazy how you bring #debian into the mix.. this is not a debian related issue and just because ubuntu uses dpkg/deb for its package management does NOT make it Debian...
Have a nice day:)
quit being like the arrogant fucks in #ubuntu.. automatix does essentially the same thing that easyubuntu does.. it all involves modifying your sources.list. I wrote the modifications for easyubuntu to work on edgy. i have also looked at the code in automatix2.. if you know much you wouldnt be stating lies like this.. automatix is just as safe as easyubuntu, regardless of what anyone from #ubuntu on freenode tells you.. If your having problems with automatix2 then chances are you would have had the same issues with easyubuntu.. If automatix2 fucks up your install, its simply because you didn't follow the instructions in the README, don't think that everything should be point and click and be done, if it has a README, read it, otherwise don't bitch about the software messing up your install....
Slashdot Mirror
I dont know what the big deal is about wikipedia containing false information.. FFS its the internet.. its not the only site that has false information, and people bitching about a 0.1% statistic.. c'mon.. thats just stupid.. does people not got anything better to do other than complain about BS like this? im sure you can find things in websters that isn't 100% fact if you look hard enough.. or at least some of you ppl would try to dispute it.. things like this irritate me.. keep it off slashdot!
#debian relates to this matter, how? I don't think it does.. and for that matter I have been in #debian for several years. Guess im waiting to get squashed for supporting both easyubuntu and automatix on ubuntu.. oh well its still crazy how you bring #debian into the mix.. this is not a debian related issue and just because ubuntu uses dpkg/deb for its package management does NOT make it Debian... Have a nice day :)
quit being like the arrogant fucks in #ubuntu.. automatix does essentially the same thing that easyubuntu does.. it all involves modifying your sources.list. I wrote the modifications for easyubuntu to work on edgy. i have also looked at the code in automatix2.. if you know much you wouldnt be stating lies like this.. automatix is just as safe as easyubuntu, regardless of what anyone from #ubuntu on freenode tells you.. If your having problems with automatix2 then chances are you would have had the same issues with easyubuntu.. If automatix2 fucks up your install, its simply because you didn't follow the instructions in the README, don't think that everything should be point and click and be done, if it has a README, read it, otherwise don't bitch about the software messing up your install....