Buried somewhere else in the comments is (hopefully) a helpful link to important REAL data on historical temperature data. But if not, here is a timely update on the Stern report and the falsification of evidence by the UN in the climate change debate:
Bottom line: it was far warmer in the middle ages. No ice at the North pole - the Chinese sailed around it in 1421. Haven't heard this before? Maybe that's because a few 'concerned' scientists decided to edit the climatological record to remove a few 'inconvenient truths'. What? Highly-regarded researchers abandon the impartiality of the scientific method for a powerful political agenda? Surely it's not possible!
I don't know about you, but it's still pretty chilly where I am. I think a little global warming sounds just fine.
Slashdot Mirror
Buried somewhere else in the comments is (hopefully) a helpful link to important REAL data on historical temperature data. But if not, here is a timely update on the Stern report and the falsification of evidence by the UN in the climate change debate:
e ws/2006/11/05/nosplit/nwarm05.xml&DCMP=EMC-new_051 12006
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/n
Bottom line: it was far warmer in the middle ages. No ice at the North pole - the Chinese sailed around it in 1421. Haven't heard this before? Maybe that's because a few 'concerned' scientists decided to edit the climatological record to remove a few 'inconvenient truths'. What? Highly-regarded researchers abandon the impartiality of the scientific method for a powerful political agenda? Surely it's not possible! I don't know about you, but it's still pretty chilly where I am. I think a little global warming sounds just fine.