Oh, man...
Block wikipedia vs block some sensitive part, which is simpler? You may know the gov's incompetence, but you may not know there are so many content to be controlled, they wouldn't bother to do that. Simply block everything they worry about, and it's people won't be able to say a word or no place to say a word.
The decision is preset, you can never see argument on this topic on mainstream press. It's unnecessary for the gov to show it's just a technical glitch. Somebody just take it granted it never exist. somebody knows the truth but they will never complain about it.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, man... Block wikipedia vs block some sensitive part, which is simpler? You may know the gov's incompetence, but you may not know there are so many content to be controlled, they wouldn't bother to do that. Simply block everything they worry about, and it's people won't be able to say a word or no place to say a word.
Thanks, you know they can not help themselves like you are.
The decision is preset, you can never see argument on this topic on mainstream press. It's unnecessary for the gov to show it's just a technical glitch. Somebody just take it granted it never exist. somebody knows the truth but they will never complain about it.
I hope the "one side" you mentioned is not refer to it's people, because it will never happen.