Well, it is not new at all, even in the IT field, and Biopassword is not the only company editing such kind of software. Take a look also at all the patents already registered, and if it is not enough to convince you, here is a list of free available pdf documents I have collected about keytroke dynamics:
1993-10 Pattern classification and scene analysis.pdf 1997-00 Keystroke Dynamics as a Biometric for Authentication.pdf 1997-04 User Recognition by Keystroke Latency Pattern Analysis.pdf 2001-10 Password hardening based on keystroke dynamics.pdf 2001-11 User authentication using keystroke dynamics.pdf 2002-06 Keystroke Biometrics.pdf 2002-10 typing dynamics biometric authentication.pdf 2003-00 Identity verification through dynamic keytroke analysis.pdf 2003-11 Keystroke dynamics.pdf 2004-00 dealing with different languages and old profiles in keystroke analysis of free text.pdf 2004-03 Identity Verification using Keyboard Statistics.pdf 2004-04 An analysis of keystroke dynamics use in user authentifcation.pdf 2004-05 Keystroke Dynamics Verification Using a Spontaneously Generated password thesis.pdf 2004-12 keystroke dynamics based authentication.pdf 2005-00 Username and Password Verification through Keystroke Dynamics thesis.pdf 2005-00 the potential for analysing free-text.pdf 2005-07 Biometric Authenticatio using Random Distributions(BioART).pdf 2006-00 Keystrok Dynamics and Corporate Security.pdf 2006-00 Keystroke Dynamics Verification Using a Spontaneously Generated password.pdf 2006-09 Keystroke dynamics- Low Impact Biometric Verification.pdf
Slashdot Mirror
Well, it is not new at all, even in the IT field, and Biopassword is not the only company editing such kind of software. Take a look also at all the patents already registered, and if it is not enough to convince you, here is a list of free available pdf documents I have collected about keytroke dynamics:
1993-10 Pattern classification and scene analysis.pdf
1997-00 Keystroke Dynamics as a Biometric for Authentication.pdf
1997-04 User Recognition by Keystroke Latency Pattern Analysis.pdf
2001-10 Password hardening based on keystroke dynamics.pdf
2001-11 User authentication using keystroke dynamics.pdf
2002-06 Keystroke Biometrics.pdf
2002-10 typing dynamics biometric authentication.pdf
2003-00 Identity verification through dynamic keytroke analysis.pdf
2003-11 Keystroke dynamics.pdf
2004-00 dealing with different languages and old profiles in keystroke analysis of free text.pdf
2004-03 Identity Verification using Keyboard Statistics.pdf
2004-04 An analysis of keystroke dynamics use in user authentifcation.pdf
2004-05 Keystroke Dynamics Verification Using a Spontaneously Generated password thesis.pdf
2004-12 keystroke dynamics based authentication.pdf
2005-00 Username and Password Verification through Keystroke Dynamics thesis.pdf
2005-00 the potential for analysing free-text.pdf
2005-07 Biometric Authenticatio using Random Distributions(BioART).pdf
2006-00 Keystrok Dynamics and Corporate Security.pdf
2006-00 Keystroke Dynamics Verification Using a Spontaneously Generated password.pdf
2006-09 Keystroke dynamics- Low Impact Biometric Verification.pdf
Oups, I should have read it one more time: this algorithm is wrong (bad use of & di)
Is this solution heavier or not ?
S = M
for i from 1 to n-1 do
S = S * S (mod N)
C = (M & di) + (1 & not di)
S = S * C (mod N)
return S