LOL you guys are quick to attack, but slow to defend...
I would point to reading Najar o Azam but i doubt you have taken the time to learn arabic.
The evidence for creationism could easily be found in the holes in the fossil record that do not support evolution. Or it could be found with logic, by researching the evidence of Christ's ressurection.
To say there is no God means that you have absolute knowledge of knowing that there is not a god anywhere...
Morals are another excellent example. The idea of morality goes against the evolutionary concept. A person would want to steal/kill because that would result in selfgain. However, every moral goes against this notion.
a part of a cell cannot exist. It would not be able to survive.
Having the DNA code half way would not create anything...
Dead mater cannot become living matter - my motorcycle will never evolve as it is non organic.
My point is, there is a lot of evidence that goes on the side of creationism.
I do think it should be taught in schools as a "theory" just as much as darwin's theory. The idea should be put forth equally. To not do so, would be to doing the thing you opposed to us doing, but in reverse.
I see you just kinda flamed but didnt even attempt to consider what I was saying.
Even this idea of evolution is crazy. Think about scabs... Those things that you get when you cut yourself. There would have to be a middle creature, one with, one without and one between. However the inbetween would not have an "advantage" but rather would die VERY quickly. In the same way a fish with "half" formed legs, wouldnt be able to fast enough to get food. These half state creatures never existed, and if they did would simply disprove the idea entirely.
There are not any positive mutations of humans on record. The only mutations that exist are ones that inhibit life.
The most brilliant people in the time following Darwin's ideas have turned down the idea. Einstein for example...
Evolution in itself has no explanation for the origin of species. (pun intended)
Consider this:
for that first living cell to exist, it would have to be able to create food (as there would be no organic food for it to feed off of), store the food, convert the food into energy, expell waste, reproduce, the list goes on...
Needless to say, this cell would be fairly complex, and it is not likely to think that these parts would just fall into place.
Furthermore, it is just silly to think that the DNA could fall into place. That is the same as saying that throwing letters at a wall would produce Shakespearen books. It doesn't work. The improbabilty is doubled, when you bring RNA into the ring.
I for one applude that someone is atleast putting common sense into their beliefs. Rather than try and say they are "fools" take a look at the rest of their site. They offer many good arguments. http://www.answersingenesis.org/
Slashdot Mirror
LOL you guys are quick to attack, but slow to defend... I would point to reading Najar o Azam but i doubt you have taken the time to learn arabic. The evidence for creationism could easily be found in the holes in the fossil record that do not support evolution. Or it could be found with logic, by researching the evidence of Christ's ressurection. To say there is no God means that you have absolute knowledge of knowing that there is not a god anywhere... Morals are another excellent example. The idea of morality goes against the evolutionary concept. A person would want to steal/kill because that would result in selfgain. However, every moral goes against this notion.
a part of a cell cannot exist. It would not be able to survive. Having the DNA code half way would not create anything... Dead mater cannot become living matter - my motorcycle will never evolve as it is non organic.
My point is, there is a lot of evidence that goes on the side of creationism. I do think it should be taught in schools as a "theory" just as much as darwin's theory. The idea should be put forth equally. To not do so, would be to doing the thing you opposed to us doing, but in reverse. I see you just kinda flamed but didnt even attempt to consider what I was saying. Even this idea of evolution is crazy. Think about scabs... Those things that you get when you cut yourself. There would have to be a middle creature, one with, one without and one between. However the inbetween would not have an "advantage" but rather would die VERY quickly. In the same way a fish with "half" formed legs, wouldnt be able to fast enough to get food. These half state creatures never existed, and if they did would simply disprove the idea entirely. There are not any positive mutations of humans on record. The only mutations that exist are ones that inhibit life. The most brilliant people in the time following Darwin's ideas have turned down the idea. Einstein for example...
Evolution in itself has no explanation for the origin of species. (pun intended) Consider this: for that first living cell to exist, it would have to be able to create food (as there would be no organic food for it to feed off of), store the food, convert the food into energy, expell waste, reproduce, the list goes on... Needless to say, this cell would be fairly complex, and it is not likely to think that these parts would just fall into place. Furthermore, it is just silly to think that the DNA could fall into place. That is the same as saying that throwing letters at a wall would produce Shakespearen books. It doesn't work. The improbabilty is doubled, when you bring RNA into the ring. I for one applude that someone is atleast putting common sense into their beliefs. Rather than try and say they are "fools" take a look at the rest of their site. They offer many good arguments. http://www.answersingenesis.org/