Well Oxford defines a terrorist as: terrorist:
noun: a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims
So the judges, juries and police officers are threatening citizen with jail time for observing there constitutional right to Freedom of the Press? Of course the media will never cover this as they see sites like you tube as a potential threat to their business model. If I see a cop breaking the law, you bet your ass the world will see it on youtube within 24 hours. As it's was published on youtube, that would certainly mean it was covered by freedom of the press. Charge me with illegal wiretapping or what ever bullshit you excuse you want, and I will do every thing in my power and beyond to see that your are held accountable for your act's of Treason and Terrorism. "There are many fates far worse than death", and Slashdotters can do all of them.
Judge: How do to you plee to the charge of violating City Code 19353.b?
Defendant: Can I see a copy of your license?
Judge: My license for what?
Defendant: Your license to publicly display, use, or reference copyrighted materials, in this case the City Code.
Judge: Of course not. Why would I need a license? There Public Laws.
Defendant: But they are copyright none the less. As a constituant governed by these laws, I co-own these laws and unless you provide me with a copy of you license for public display, I'm going to have to issue you a take DMCA Takedown notice...
Judge: You're in contempt of court!!!
Defendant: Unfortunately, your honor, the procedures that govern 'contempt of court' are also Copyrighted, I'm afraid I'll have to issue another DMCA notice. Furthermore, your flagrant disregard for copyright law is a clear indication of Judaical incompetence, and grounds for a mistrial....
Slashdot Mirror
I think the Song was better...
Well Oxford defines a terrorist as:
terrorist: noun: a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims
So the judges, juries and police officers are threatening citizen with jail time for observing there constitutional right to Freedom of the Press? Of course the media will never cover this as they see sites like you tube as a potential threat to their business model. If I see a cop breaking the law, you bet your ass the world will see it on youtube within 24 hours. As it's was published on youtube, that would certainly mean it was covered by freedom of the press. Charge me with illegal wiretapping or what ever bullshit you excuse you want, and I will do every thing in my power and beyond to see that your are held accountable for your act's of Treason and Terrorism. "There are many fates far worse than death", and Slashdotters can do all of them.
Judge: How do to you plee to the charge of violating City Code 19353.b? Defendant: Can I see a copy of your license? Judge: My license for what? Defendant: Your license to publicly display, use, or reference copyrighted materials, in this case the City Code. Judge: Of course not. Why would I need a license? There Public Laws. Defendant: But they are copyright none the less. As a constituant governed by these laws, I co-own these laws and unless you provide me with a copy of you license for public display, I'm going to have to issue you a take DMCA Takedown notice... Judge: You're in contempt of court!!! Defendant: Unfortunately, your honor, the procedures that govern 'contempt of court' are also Copyrighted, I'm afraid I'll have to issue another DMCA notice. Furthermore, your flagrant disregard for copyright law is a clear indication of Judaical incompetence, and grounds for a mistrial....
It's been rebranded as the new and improved âFare Useâ(TM). Seriously people, get spell check...