The G5 is not compatible with the G4, not by a long shot.
yet all OS 9 software runs in OS 9 under OS X.
Microsoft just doesn't have good coders, not yet. They probably will, if more dipshits continue to use illegal versions of Windows, thus allowing Microsoft to claim most of the world uses it.
Of course most of the world uses it. It's just not payed for by most of the world, or Microsoft would be even richer.
- I use a Mac, I pay for the coder's hard work, Apple coders get to eat food by writing good decent software.
There's no such thing as neutral in this compiler optimized world, my friend. Linux (*cough* THE KERNEL) is far more optimized on the x86 than on the G5.
Neutrality doesn't exist, so people should perhaps STOP with this comparing bullshit.
It's really quite simple. Which computer can YOU use better? Pick one. Nice choice, now smile and use it. This whole coke vs pepsi bullshit has got to stop. It works fine in the soda world, but not in the hammer shed, where really, it's a matter of the right tool for the job, not the faster, more option filled tool.
Afterall, you aren't using a pnumatic hammer at home to nail in the nails for your pictures, are you? Well I know 99% of the world isn't...
and damn, that hammer can hammer in 1,000 nails a minute!! Beat that you shitt old hand held hammer... yeah!
"But I can build it cheaper myself, why would anyone wannt to BUY this for $90,000, when you can build it using several RAIDS and cheap IDEs for a quarter of the price"
expose makes me drool, not just because of it's visual and intuitive nature, but mostly because it provides me with the tool I realize now I've been missing all along in my desktop computing environments.
You are absolutely right! Now go back and bury your head in your Open Source ass and play your video games on your most likely purchased and legal version of Windows, with your legally owned games and listen to your legally bought music that you converted to MP3s...
or am I wrong in my assumptions too just like you were about yours above?
You're damned right it's a niche market, for a good reason too. Because most of the populus of/. thinks just like you.
I'm very excited about Xcode. I remember when I first got my copy of the Linux kernel version 1.2.3 or something even nastier than that, I was just as excited then as I am now.
Apple tax? Oh you mean paying someone for hard work and good and decent engineering? Not the clunkiness of X11's user interface or of XP? Everything has it's tax, for some things it's money, for others it's time or experience.
I've setup Safari to prompt me before accepting cookies. You may think it's a pain in the ass, but really, after the first month of sticking to it, it's a piece of cake. The sites you normally visit you allow, and after that, any new sites yuo have to worry about. Not a big deal, maybe a collected list of banned cookies should be sent with browsers. But then the ad agencies would adapt, and it would become another technological arms race...
the best part of this whole article was this sentence
"The counter is placed on computer hard drives by a cookie, a software file that a Web site places without the recipient's permission or notification and that transmits information back to the site."
without permission or notification? Man, these dipshits don't know anything about browsers do they? Let alone how to make one prompt you for cookies..
Slashdot Mirror
indeed my point exactly.
except I was too lazy to write all that stuff down, those who know, know what they know.
but one other aspect is interesting. Perhaps in reality, we should move away from 32-bit as fast as possible.
And yet 64-bit isn't much better, so what do we do? keep bitgrading? To what end?
really? woohoo!
:)
then this is yet another reason why RISC is better
what a lame ass excuse.
The G5 is not compatible with the G4, not by a long shot.
yet all OS 9 software runs in OS 9 under OS X.
Microsoft just doesn't have good coders, not yet. They probably will, if more dipshits continue to use illegal versions of Windows, thus allowing Microsoft to claim most of the world uses it.
Of course most of the world uses it. It's just not payed for by most of the world, or Microsoft would be even richer.
- I use a Mac, I pay for the coder's hard work, Apple coders get to eat food by writing good decent software.
There's no such thing as neutral in this compiler optimized world, my friend. Linux (*cough* THE KERNEL) is far more optimized on the x86 than on the G5.
Neutrality doesn't exist, so people should perhaps STOP with this comparing bullshit.
It's really quite simple. Which computer can YOU use better? Pick one. Nice choice, now smile and use it. This whole coke vs pepsi bullshit has got to stop. It works fine in the soda world, but not in the hammer shed, where really, it's a matter of the right tool for the job, not the faster, more option filled tool.
Afterall, you aren't using a pnumatic hammer at home to nail in the nails for your pictures, are you? Well I know 99% of the world isn't...
and damn, that hammer can hammer in 1,000 nails a minute!! Beat that you shitt old hand held hammer... yeah!
no no, YOU come on..
:)
Craig J. Mathias has an article published in EEtimes, his dick is bigger than yours!
g0d?
Mmmmmmmmmmmm.. I can almost taste the jizz...
New invention, cameras that capture SCENT with pictures. Now that might be tricky, but it probably could work.
light is made up of 3 colors.. so why can't scent be made up of some primitives, too?
a beowulf cluster of 3D cameras!!
Yes, USA, isn't that enough?
Imagine a beowulf cluster of p2p networks???????????
WHOA.....
Now can we please hear someone saying
/.
"But I can build it cheaper myself, why would anyone wannt to BUY this for $90,000, when you can build it using several RAIDS and cheap IDEs for a quarter of the price"
yeah..
imagine a beowulf cluster of Dell's....
no... no.... NOOOOOOo!
expose makes me drool, not just because of it's visual and intuitive nature, but mostly because it provides me with the tool I realize now I've been missing all along in my desktop computing environments.
You are absolutely right! Now go back and bury your head in your Open Source ass and play your video games on your most likely purchased and legal version of Windows, with your legally owned games and listen to your legally bought music that you converted to MP3s...
/. thinks just like you.
or am I wrong in my assumptions too just like you were about yours above?
You're damned right it's a niche market, for a good reason too. Because most of the populus of
I'm very excited about Xcode. I remember when I first got my copy of the Linux kernel version 1.2.3 or something even nastier than that, I was just as excited then as I am now.
:)
Expose? WICKED!!!
iChat AV? AWESOME!!
Brushed Metal Finder? You missed the fine print, that's not the new feature.
Favorites panel in Mac != Favorites panel in Windows
and once and for all..
Mac OS X takes 20 mins to install and has no serial numbers.
Grow up. Frankly I'm tired of the likes of you.
Apple tax? Oh you mean paying someone for hard work and good and decent engineering? Not the clunkiness of X11's user interface or of XP? Everything has it's tax, for some things it's money, for others it's time or experience.
yes!!!! IT DOES! Like a bulldozer on your ass fault!
floppy to floppy?
You must live on the moon. I haven't used a floppy disk in the last 4 years.
Why only music? WTF kinda stupid ass question is that.
You live in America, Slashdot is in America, and you ask why only music...
BECAUSE ONLY "popular" MUSIC HAS THE GREEDY RIAA.
Look at me, I'm using bad words and capital letters. I'm l33t.
wow, I'm sure nobody thought of this before.
The word NOW in all capitals, that really got attention of developers.
This is slashdot, most posts will be
- someone claiming to know better than those who are actually doing it
- whining abuot those doing it and why they aren't doing it the way of the slashdot user, afterall, they know best.
- posts such as yours, asking for people to stop posting this way
- posts like mine, pointing out the various posts
- REPEATED NEWS STORIES
man your comment was so long, I decided to take a piss. Felt much more productive.
I've setup Safari to prompt me before accepting cookies. You may think it's a pain in the ass, but really, after the first month of sticking to it, it's a piece of cake. The sites you normally visit you allow, and after that, any new sites yuo have to worry about. Not a big deal, maybe a collected list of banned cookies should be sent with browsers. But then the ad agencies would adapt, and it would become another technological arms race...
silly really.
the best part of this whole article was this sentence
"The counter is placed on computer hard drives by a cookie, a software file that a Web site places without the recipient's permission or notification and that transmits information back to the site."
without permission or notification? Man, these dipshits don't know anything about browsers do they? Let alone how to make one prompt you for cookies..