"The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate". This is very important and easy to prove. It says that you cannot prove whether an object is really itself, or if it might in fact be an identical clone of itself. That this is strictly "indeterminate". This is also true of numbers, etc. This is Harris's Theorem, and is perhaps the most important theorem in all of mathematics. I'm not sure if his "nullity" is the same as triviality, but it might be. I am not familiar with what this man is doing. Triviality is not a trashcan. There is a distinction between the trivial and the strictly nonexistent. You have existence, nonexistence, and there IS a third existential type which is the trivial. It is a third type because "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate", and I can prove it easily. All you need to do is play with uniqueness. http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com] Respectfully, Dr. Viktor I. Planckenstein
There are some very interesting things about zero, and triviality.
First, "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate". This is very important and easy to prove. It says that you cannot prove whether an object is really itself, or if it might in fact be an identical clone of itself. That this is strictly "indeterminate". This is also true of numbers, etc. This is Harris's Theorem, and is perhaps the most important theorem in all of mathematics.
I'm not sure if his "nullity" is the same as triviality, but it might be. I am not familiar with what this man is doing.
Next, when are apples equal to oranges ? When you have zero of them !! Yes - indeed - zero apples is identical to zero oranges. There is no difference !! Triviality is not a trashcan. There is a distinction between the trivial and the strictly nonexistent. If this man is teaching nonsense to schoolchildren then he should be flogged. But if he is investigating the idea of triviality then I'd say he should get a medal. I think that I'd need to see his math first before making that call.
Is an apple the same as an orange ? Yes, when you have zero of each !!! An apple is an orange !!! I am not advocating division by zero, but there is certainly MUCH to be said regarding triviality !
You have existence, nonexistence, and there IS a third existential type which is the trivial. It is a third type because "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate", and I can prove it easily. All you need to do is play with uniqueness.
http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/
Respectfully, Dr. Viktor I. Planckenstein
Slashdot Mirror
"The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate". This is very important and easy to prove. It says that you cannot prove whether an object is really itself, or if it might in fact be an identical clone of itself. That this is strictly "indeterminate". This is also true of numbers, etc. This is Harris's Theorem, and is perhaps the most important theorem in all of mathematics. I'm not sure if his "nullity" is the same as triviality, but it might be. I am not familiar with what this man is doing. Triviality is not a trashcan. There is a distinction between the trivial and the strictly nonexistent. You have existence, nonexistence, and there IS a third existential type which is the trivial. It is a third type because "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate", and I can prove it easily. All you need to do is play with uniqueness. http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com] Respectfully, Dr. Viktor I. Planckenstein
There are some very interesting things about zero, and triviality. First, "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate". This is very important and easy to prove. It says that you cannot prove whether an object is really itself, or if it might in fact be an identical clone of itself. That this is strictly "indeterminate". This is also true of numbers, etc. This is Harris's Theorem, and is perhaps the most important theorem in all of mathematics. I'm not sure if his "nullity" is the same as triviality, but it might be. I am not familiar with what this man is doing. Next, when are apples equal to oranges ? When you have zero of them !! Yes - indeed - zero apples is identical to zero oranges. There is no difference !! Triviality is not a trashcan. There is a distinction between the trivial and the strictly nonexistent. If this man is teaching nonsense to schoolchildren then he should be flogged. But if he is investigating the idea of triviality then I'd say he should get a medal. I think that I'd need to see his math first before making that call. Is an apple the same as an orange ? Yes, when you have zero of each !!! An apple is an orange !!! I am not advocating division by zero, but there is certainly MUCH to be said regarding triviality ! You have existence, nonexistence, and there IS a third existential type which is the trivial. It is a third type because "The Existence of a Trivial is Indeterminate", and I can prove it easily. All you need to do is play with uniqueness. http://sciphysicsopenmanuscript.blogspot.com/ Respectfully, Dr. Viktor I. Planckenstein