Are you crazy? Do you really sit around and watch public access tv? The internet has changed the world. Most of the information is available online, on demand. If there was demand for access to what you talk about, dont you think that someone would be providing it without having someone legislating that the people who buy the service pay for something that is free online?
Is it really "public access" if you have to have cable to get it?
Isnt this like saying that a company should offer the most expensive services in areas that arent able to buy expensive things. Anyway.
Like saying that Blue Ray DVD players need to be accessible for all? I am on the Att side, and I think the following shows that they are not trying to hurt anyone. Have you heard about anything like this with cable?
http://www.statesman.com/search/content/news/stori es/local/12/17/17internet.html
By the way, my cable rates go up next year. I think we could stand a little competition in my area
Slashdot Mirror
Are you crazy? Do you really sit around and watch public access tv? The internet has changed the world. Most of the information is available online, on demand. If there was demand for access to what you talk about, dont you think that someone would be providing it without having someone legislating that the people who buy the service pay for something that is free online? Is it really "public access" if you have to have cable to get it?
Isnt this like saying that a company should offer the most expensive services in areas that arent able to buy expensive things. Anyway. Like saying that Blue Ray DVD players need to be accessible for all? I am on the Att side, and I think the following shows that they are not trying to hurt anyone. Have you heard about anything like this with cable? http://www.statesman.com/search/content/news/stori es/local/12/17/17internet.html
By the way, my cable rates go up next year. I think we could stand a little competition in my area