Slashdot Mirror


User: pvc

pvc's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. Re:Not suprising given the recent court ruling on San Francisco Attempts to Regulate Blogging · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yup, no criticism in the mainstream media at all.

    pvc

  2. Re:Handwriting Analysis.... on Bill Gates Handwriting Analyzed · · Score: 1

    Just a small comment for those who haven't come across graphology before: try it.

    Seriously, just grab a book on it and have a play. Don't take it too seriously but give it a whirl; it's surprisingly interesting. There's more information there than you'd think.

    Just don't take a small amount of text/doodlings and extrapolate a huge character profile from it; only journalists do that :)

    pvc

  3. Re:simple on Backing Up is Hard to Do? · · Score: 1

    Totally agreed.

    I have internal-disk-1 nitely rsyncing to internal-disk-2 and then (every wkend or so) I rsync to external-usb-disk and keep that off-site. Works very well for me.

    pvc

  4. Re:CNN Story on Latest Version of MyDoom Exploits New IE Flaw · · Score: 1

    AFAIK: Compared to/with depends on context. You "compare to" when likening; "compare with" when contrasting.

    pvc

  5. Re:Where have I heard this before? on One, Two, Many - Language Shapes Thought · · Score: 1

    There was an interesting BBC Radio 4 program on this: Bird Brains.

    pvc

  6. IUMA on Aussies Face Jail Over MP3s · · Score: 1

    I tend to get a lot of good stuff from IUMA. They have a way to buy the CDs from artists you like as well. Do folks know of many other sites like this (aside from mp3.com I guess)?

    pvc

  7. Re:Spelling on Testing Microsoft And The DMCA · · Score: 1

    [pedant mode on]
    Actually, I believe that (strictly speaking) it should be "owing to"...

    pvc

  8. Oh I don't know on Microsoft Edits English · · Score: 1

    &lttroll&gt
    "Yank" still comes back with "jerk" doesn't it :)
    &lt/troll&gt

    pvc

  9. Culled from comp.risks on 4C May Back Down On Hard-Disk Copy Protection · · Score: 1

    There seem to be conflicting reports of this:

    Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 06:35:10 -0500
    From: "Gelsinger, Patrick P"
    Subject: Re: IBM and Intel push copy protection ... (Gilmore, RISKS-21.17)

    [Received via Dave Farber, whom Patrick had requested to post a correction.]

    Content protection technology misinformation generates negative web-press
    coverage:

    An article on *The Register* website "Stealth plan puts copy protection into
    every hard drive" contains false information that the 4C's (Intel, IBM, MEI,
    Toshiba) Content Protection for Recordable Media (CPRM) is to be applied to
    all PC hard drives. It is misinterpreting a specification for use of CPRM
    with the Compact Flash media format (which supports either semiconductor
    flash memory or IBM microdrives) probably because Compact Flash uses the
    same command protocol interface as standard PC harddrives. The technology
    is neither intended nor licensed for use with PC harddrives and is optional
    even for the supported media types (flash memory and microdrives). John
    Gilmore, a noted privacy and consumer advocate, has picked up the article
    and further propagated the erroneous information and mentioned Intel
    "IBM&Intel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives". I have alerted
    public relations at Intel and are disseminating accurate information within
    Intel and among our industry contacts.

    Pat