User: ukupanipo

Re:Ask a scientist

On: When Celebrities Speak on Science

I agree with your assertion that celebrities and politicians espouse inanities. However, I am not completely sold on the idea that the US science curriculum is to blame. In my somewhat blinkered experience I have come to the semi-conclusion that the public's lack of scientific understanding is due in part to the student's attitude towards "work". First, let us admit that science courses are slightly more rigorous than something such as "alternative human sexuality" (actual course at my alma mater). Some students just don't want to put in the effort to learn something they feel is meaningless to their lives. Also, I don't think a greater supply of scientific consultants is the answer - they would almost certainly have to become sycophants to get the position anyway... due in part to the "cult of personality" that pervades politics.

...but it has been no accident that during the most progressive periods in history, we have relied on scientists and others who are trained to think and inquire to make some of our biggest technological advancements. These advancements include great strides in medicine, prolonging life-spans and improving the quality of life as well as ending global wars and in the absence of political influences, ending famine and disease.

Please be so kind as to refer me to the historical evidence for that statement. Historically speaking, science has frequently been used as both the impetus and chief weapon for prosecuting global wars (Scientific America 2002)? We must be careful to use critical thinking especially when contemplating the relative wisdom of oneself. Scientists are humans - they are therefore prone to foolishness just like everyone else.