I would imagine that it's like the use of other recordings; you would be required to testify under oath that the recording is accurate and hasn't been tampered with. It would be up to the other party to prove otherwise, with the understanding that lying under oath (even in a civil proceeding) is a felony.
Slashdot Mirror
I would imagine that it's like the use of other recordings; you would be required to testify under oath that the recording is accurate and hasn't been tampered with. It would be up to the other party to prove otherwise, with the understanding that lying under oath (even in a civil proceeding) is a felony.