I basically agree that it's provocation to name the game as such. Having played the game, however, I find nothing really appealing about it. The graphics are about as good as tetris in my opinion and I'm into high fidelity games, so this one is a thumbs down IMHO.
I have to wonder, in light of a recent politician's remarks (who shall be nameless in this post to avoid off-topic flame wars), would a game titled "Super Slave Trader RPG 2007" (lemmings, anyone?) or "Jesus de Nazareth: El Crucifixio" (el diablo, anyone?) would garner as much (negative) public commentary as the super columbine RPG?
In other words, (no pun intended) would the columbine game be less provocative if named differently or are some titles of games so emotionally charged as to be completely off-limits?
Things that make you go hmmm...
Slashdot Mirror
I basically agree that it's provocation to name the game as such. Having played the game, however, I find nothing really appealing about it. The graphics are about as good as tetris in my opinion and I'm into high fidelity games, so this one is a thumbs down IMHO. I have to wonder, in light of a recent politician's remarks (who shall be nameless in this post to avoid off-topic flame wars), would a game titled "Super Slave Trader RPG 2007" (lemmings, anyone?) or "Jesus de Nazareth: El Crucifixio" (el diablo, anyone?) would garner as much (negative) public commentary as the super columbine RPG? In other words, (no pun intended) would the columbine game be less provocative if named differently or are some titles of games so emotionally charged as to be completely off-limits? Things that make you go hmmm ...
By the looks of the fresh new pics of unboxing the 800, I'd say replacement. Here's the link to the unboxing of the 800 I found: http://www.ringnokia.com/2007/01/nokia_n800_inte.h tml#more