Clashing egos can cause anything to fail. It's not just "open source". I've lost track of the number of times at my company when the fifty year old executives start acting like three year olds. The only thing different about "open source" is that a lot of the developers don't get paid for their work, so you don't have the threat of losing wages and pension (if any) keeping people in a project. As a result, the emotional return on investment is more important.
Maybe Debian works; I hated its installation setup so much that I've never tried it again (2.0). Of course, I could make the same comment you made about Redhat. Its getting so that the question of what is standard is going the same way as the commercial unix world. At the moment, I still like Suse.
So close and yet so far. Even if I agree with your conclusion, you can't get there with that reasoning. Dicta is extraneous, non-binding text in a judge's written decision. It is not applicable to statutes, regulations, or the U.S. Constitution. In statutory interpretation, each word is presumed to have meaning bearing on the subject. (At least not in the eighteen years I've been practicing law.) Now you can think about the implications of the phrases "well regulated", "security of [the] state" and how those might apply to a non-organized militia (organized militias being run by the states). You might still be correct, but tighten up your arguments a bit.
Slashdot Mirror
Clashing egos can cause anything to fail. It's not just "open source". I've lost track of the number of times at my company when the fifty year old executives start acting like three year olds. The only thing different about "open source" is that a lot of the developers don't get paid for their work, so you don't have the threat of losing wages and pension (if any) keeping people in a project. As a result, the emotional return on investment is more important.
>>s it possible to be an AG but not being publicly traded ?
Yes. You can be an AG and have only one of shareholder.
Maybe Debian works; I hated its installation setup so much that I've never tried it again (2.0). Of course, I could make the same comment you made about Redhat. Its getting so that the question of what is standard is going the same way as the commercial unix world. At the moment, I still like Suse.
So close and yet so far. Even if I agree with your conclusion, you can't get there with that reasoning. Dicta is extraneous, non-binding text in a judge's written decision. It is not applicable to statutes, regulations, or the U.S. Constitution. In statutory interpretation, each word is presumed to have meaning bearing on the subject. (At least not in the eighteen years I've been practicing law.) Now you can think about the implications of the phrases "well regulated", "security of [the] state" and how those might apply to a non-organized militia (organized militias being run by the states). You might still be correct, but tighten up your arguments a bit.