Slashdot Mirror


User: Wickethewok

Wickethewok's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:FACTS, not "truth". on Britannica Goes After Wikipedia and Google · · Score: 1

    I agree that arbitrary notability guidelines (like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC) are a waste of time. All that's really needed is the primary notability criterion: something "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Though, even the primary criterion isn't necessary; it's just a way of saying that something meets Wikipedia's verifiability policy.

  2. The Jimmy Appeal on Wikipedia Almost Reaches $6 Million Target · · Score: 1

    Possibly of interest is the appeal that Jimmy Wales wrote and has been featured on one of the banners. Apparently this particular site notice was particularly effective: http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/12/30/fundraiser-jimmys-appeal/

  3. Re:Financial Reward (TM) on Wikipedia Almost Reaches $6 Million Target · · Score: 1

    Maybe most edits by QUANTITY are generated by anonymous users, but the actually GOOD articles are generated by people who actually sit down and take a bunch of hours to research/write/edit. You don't get something fairly reliable, readable, and well-organized by having a hundred different anonymous editors each contribute a sentence. That isn't to say there aren't valuable anonymous editors, just that when people start contributing quality information regularly, they tend to register for the sake of convenience.

  4. Big... on How Small a PC Is Too Small? · · Score: 1
  5. non-news on Sinbad Rises From Wikipedia Grave · · Score: 1

    Wow, so every time a Wikipedia article is vandalized we need a newspaper article and slashdot post about it? This is such non-news...