The more we are able to protect our freedom ourselves the less we need government. Government is the product of laziness, we don't want to protect ourselves so we pay the price of asking others to do it for us. The protectors like their cushy job. More see how nice the protectors have it and they want their piece of the pie. Eventually you have the US Government. They provide very little for a very high price tag. And the cost just keeps increasing.
When the conditions degrade slowly people seem to just accept the state of things.
I am quite certain that the founders of the US would have been considered our current government worse than the King they revolted against.
I find the attitude of a disproportionately high percentage of the population there to be self-centred, small-minded, racist people...
Sad but true. America is big and many people rarely if ever travel outside of their home town. Even if they travel as much as a thousand kilometers most are in another area much the same as their home.
Makes it easy to assume that what they see on TV is due to stupidity of the people "over there".
That will never happen, unless attendance at an accredited university is a prerequisite. Because scores of the self educated would demonstrate the universities to be superfluous. That would take money out of the hands of the schools, they are a business after all.
In other words, teaching is not something anyone can do. Most of the PhD's I have known are good at going to school and rote memorization. Teaching is not one of their strengths. In fact, quite often, working is not either.
There are many articles available on the proper siting of a weather station. None would include the picture in the article as even poor. That is horrible. That throws all of the data into question.
Yet a lower limit would not have stopped that drunk.
A zero limit would not have stopped that.
A lower limit simply increases the income for the state, and keeps the people who are not a problem from buying more. The point, the problem driver doesn't care what the limit is.
You might change your mind about that if you had a couple of Christmas cookies (rum balls) then got pulled over by a cop who didn't like the way you look (JDLR - just don't look right). With the fresh rum from the cookies you could blow greater than the limit. Then you have a DUI arrest. The arrest stays on your record even if you beat it. That is simply an addendum to the arrest record. Your Insurance skyrockets, several attorneys profit, The economy is improved at your expense. But it is good for the many.
It needs to be against the law have an accident where you are impaired in any form. Including stupidity.
Not, "Well, you might have an accident if you keep going like this." That is like "Future Crime".
Bar owners are in the business of selling drinks. They will not put something in that could effectively stop the sale of drinks. Specially if they have to pay for it.
Outlaw cars. Everyone can walk or use public transportation. Then you will be safe using your cell phone. The highways will last longer with less traffic. There is another savings.
But totally unrealistic. Life is a risk.
Some drunks drive better than most phone users.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe the judge owns stock in Seagate, WD and Hitachi?
Big company, Lots of momentum. The death will sadly be slow.
My first hard drive was a Micropolis 1300 20Mb $1200 Employee discount.
I put it on my S-100 system for which I had to write the BIOS in assembler.
That was about 1985
Thank you Johnathan Hoag
Not to worry, Nathan will reboot it.
Their combined thoughts became so heavy that they caved in on themselves. Now not even thought can escape.
Moral: Don't worry, have another ginnan tonix or what ever you call it on your planet.
I would probably laugh at that but I have a HotBlack concert to get to.
The more we are able to protect our freedom ourselves the less we need government. Government is the product of laziness, we don't want to protect ourselves so we pay the price of asking others to do it for us. The protectors like their cushy job. More see how nice the protectors have it and they want their piece of the pie. Eventually you have the US Government. They provide very little for a very high price tag. And the cost just keeps increasing.
When the conditions degrade slowly people seem to just accept the state of things.
I am quite certain that the founders of the US would have been considered our current government worse than the King they revolted against.
Why do you need politicians? Do you feel a need to have someone tell you what to do while you support them?
So you're happy with the way things are and see no room for improvement?
Makes it easy to assume that what they see on TV is due to stupidity of the people "over there".
Fire ALL of the politicians and revoke the retirement of all living politicians. Make them actually earn their living.
Then we have lots of money for education.
That will never happen, unless attendance at an accredited university is a prerequisite. Because scores of the self educated would demonstrate the universities to be superfluous. That would take money out of the hands of the schools, they are a business after all.
If the Self Checkout at Lowes is an example of automation replacing people, I'm not worried.
In other words, teaching is not something anyone can do. Most of the PhD's I have known are good at going to school and rote memorization. Teaching is not one of their strengths. In fact, quite often, working is not either.
Don't for get the Wall Street favorite, downsizing.
Or you are older and make more than companies want to pay.
Four is better than zero. Plus no increase in tenured (useless) teachers.
Again, it makes you look like your just trying to pick a fight and it diminishes the effectiveness of your report.
That would be you are or as a contraction you're is correct.
There are many articles available on the proper siting of a weather station. None would include the picture in the article as even poor. That is horrible. That throws all of the data into question.
Yet a lower limit would not have stopped that drunk.
A zero limit would not have stopped that.
A lower limit simply increases the income for the state, and keeps the people who are not a problem from buying more. The point, the problem driver doesn't care what the limit is.
The goal is to gather more money. Period.
You might change your mind about that if you had a couple of Christmas cookies (rum balls) then got pulled over by a cop who didn't like the way you look (JDLR - just don't look right). With the fresh rum from the cookies you could blow greater than the limit. Then you have a DUI arrest. The arrest stays on your record even if you beat it. That is simply an addendum to the arrest record. Your Insurance skyrockets, several attorneys profit, The economy is improved at your expense. But it is good for the many.
It needs to be against the law have an accident where you are impaired in any form. Including stupidity.
Not, "Well, you might have an accident if you keep going like this." That is like "Future Crime".
Bar owners are in the business of selling drinks. They will not put something in that could effectively stop the sale of drinks. Specially if they have to pay for it.
Mod this up!!!!
Accurate and insightful.
Outlaw cars. Everyone can walk or use public transportation. Then you will be safe using your cell phone. The highways will last longer with less traffic. There is another savings.
But totally unrealistic. Life is a risk.
Some drunks drive better than most phone users.