I have no question for AO's John Vranesevich, but I'd like to say a few things about slashdot's criteria used to select people for interviewing. I've read a lot of complaints about interviewing JP and the hacker wannabe from MTV's show. I do believe those comments show that interviewing JP (or the boy) was the right choice. I mean, if the IT scene has such a hate on someone, it's always worth to hear what he has to say (and remember, noone is guilty until proved and everyone has the right to defend himself).
Anyway, I must say that I'd like a selection criteria based on the positive aspects of the interviewed.
Slashdot Mirror
I have no question for AO's John Vranesevich, but I'd like to say a few things about slashdot's criteria used to select people for interviewing.
I've read a lot of complaints about interviewing JP and the hacker wannabe from MTV's show.
I do believe those comments show that interviewing JP (or the boy) was the right choice.
I mean, if the IT scene has such a hate on someone, it's always worth to hear what he has to say (and remember, noone is guilty until proved and everyone has the right to defend himself).
Anyway, I must say that I'd like a selection criteria based on the positive aspects of the interviewed.
-- krahd