A lot of what you say has do with interperating the Bible literally. Old Testament books were passed on by oral tradition. The details changed but the core message renamed the same. The first book of the New Testament was not written until at least 25 (more I think) years after Jesus was Crucified. The authors of the 4 Gospels were also writting for specific audiences. They were telling their intended audiences about Jesus in a way they could understand. For example Luke wrote for non Jews. Mark was the earliest Gospel. Mathew and Luke built off that Gospel and another source called "Q". Q was a collections of sayings attributed to Jesus. John was written last by someone believed to be in Greece (palms for Palm Sunday, I don't think Isreal had palm trees at that time, they were brought in later). Yes there are inconsitancies in the Bible. They were not written right after Jesus' death but years after. Inconsitancies in quotes come from the authors presenting the message of Christ in their own way for their own audiences. They were also going off inspiration and presumably other writtings. Can you remeber details clearly from an event more than 25 years ago. The message is what is important.
How can Jesus be God? Three people in one God: Father, Son (Jesus), Holy Spirit.
Jesus is also fully human yet fully divine. There is something called faith. Your agruments are about fine details in books written years ago that have gone through translations and revisions. The Gospels weren't started until well after Jesus ascended into Heaven(20+ years). The Bible was revised by many editors. There is a passage in John that is believed to have originated in Luke. It was put in John because someone thought it fit better there. The fine detail of numbers aren't important. The message is what is important. Some of your quotes seem suspiciously like they were taken out of context.
I've used LM for about 7 months now. I started out with version 6.0. LM 6.0 through 6.1 used the RH installer. The main differnce between two are LM's pentium optimizations and the use of KDE as the standard desktop. This was my first experience with Linux. LM put a icon on the desktop to download and install updates. It was simple to install and it work right away for me. LM also added X configuration during the installation. That made setting up the system easy.
LM 7 seperated from the RH install tools infavor of a pretty graphical install. It also added a tool (DraxConf) that put a lot of configuration options in one place that was easy to understand.
LM seems to want to be a cutting edge distribution. That allows the distro to ship with features that would require the user to download and install things seperatly. That can be good and that can be bad. There are some problems with supermount that for some, seem to require disabling supermout. The installer also appearantly recognized I had a CD-R and setup SCSI emulation and set up my CD-R on/dev/scd0, but then setup fstab to mount it on/dec/cdrom.
I like LM because it is simple to install, made updating easy, and is stable.
Mandrake was based off Redhat. Thats why they include RH software. But, they've seperated from RH. LM 7 is out and RH is still on 6.1 I think. They are after compatibility with RH while doing their own distribution.
Slashdot Mirror
>Pass off his opinion like its work something
That troll needs to learn how to proofread.
A lot of what you say has do with interperating the Bible literally. Old Testament books were passed on by oral tradition. The details changed but the core message renamed the same. The first book of the New Testament was not written until at least 25 (more I think) years after Jesus was Crucified. The authors of the 4 Gospels were also writting for specific audiences. They were telling their intended audiences about Jesus in a way they could understand. For example Luke wrote for non Jews. Mark was the earliest Gospel. Mathew and Luke built off that Gospel and another source called "Q". Q was a collections of sayings attributed to Jesus. John was written last by someone believed to be in Greece (palms for Palm Sunday, I don't think Isreal had palm trees at that time, they were brought in later). Yes there are inconsitancies in the Bible. They were not written right after Jesus' death but years after. Inconsitancies in quotes come from the authors presenting the message of Christ in their own way for their own audiences. They were also going off inspiration and presumably other writtings. Can you remeber details clearly from an event more than 25 years ago. The message is what is important.
How can Jesus be God? Three people in one God: Father, Son (Jesus), Holy Spirit.
Jesus is also fully human yet fully divine. There is something called faith. Your agruments are about fine details in books written years ago that have gone through translations and revisions. The Gospels weren't started until well after Jesus ascended into Heaven(20+ years). The Bible was revised by many editors. There is a passage in John that is believed to have originated in Luke. It was put in John because someone thought it fit better there. The fine detail of numbers aren't important. The message is what is important. Some of your quotes seem suspiciously like they were taken out of context.
Richard
I've used LM for about 7 months now. I started out with version 6.0. LM 6.0 through 6.1 used the RH installer. The main differnce between two are LM's pentium optimizations and the use of KDE as the standard desktop. This was my first experience with Linux. LM put a icon on the desktop to download and install updates. It was simple to install and it work right away for me. LM also added X configuration during the installation. That made setting up the system easy.
/dev/scd0, but then setup fstab to mount it on /dec/cdrom.
LM 7 seperated from the RH install tools infavor of a pretty graphical install. It also added a tool (DraxConf) that put a lot of configuration options in one place that was easy to understand.
LM seems to want to be a cutting edge distribution. That allows the distro to ship with features that would require the user to download and install things seperatly. That can be good and that can be bad. There are some problems with supermount that for some, seem to require disabling supermout. The installer also appearantly recognized I had a CD-R and setup SCSI emulation and set up my CD-R on
I like LM because it is simple to install, made updating easy, and is stable.
Richard
>If someone has a decent replacement for GDM, I'd love to hear about it.
There is wdm and kdm.
Mandrake was based off Redhat. Thats why they include RH software. But, they've seperated from RH. LM 7 is out and RH is still on 6.1 I think. They are after compatibility with RH while doing their own distribution.
Diskmaster II was awesome. Started up real fast. Configuration was done in a text file. Once it was set up, it was great to use.
What happened to the lizards and the ferret?