check this out! http://www.2008horserace.com/ its just an online poll, until you scroll down and see that one candidate has been suspended for voter fraud. the site mod claims that spam-bots generated "unrealistic" votes of over 10 per minute for Dr. Paul, and yet it says on their main page that only 2 votes will be accepted per IP address. clicking on the current results link at the bottom of the left hand column, reveals some interesting things about the site's operator(s). http://vote.sparklit.com/popup_poll/999583 for something that presents itself as professional, the rather juvenile name calling responses added to peoples comments is a bit disconcerting. i myself have had my IP address banned for questioning this, and my question removed.
if ever there was a type of site that i would love to see 'shashdot-ed' this would be it.
Slashdot Mirror
agreed! it just makes it easier to re-enforce the old saying... "he who casts the vote decides nothing. he who counts the votes decided everything."
check this out! http://www.2008horserace.com/ its just an online poll, until you scroll down and see that one candidate has been suspended for voter fraud. the site mod claims that spam-bots generated "unrealistic" votes of over 10 per minute for Dr. Paul, and yet it says on their main page that only 2 votes will be accepted per IP address. clicking on the current results link at the bottom of the left hand column, reveals some interesting things about the site's operator(s). http://vote.sparklit.com/popup_poll/999583 for something that presents itself as professional, the rather juvenile name calling responses added to peoples comments is a bit disconcerting. i myself have had my IP address banned for questioning this, and my question removed. if ever there was a type of site that i would love to see 'shashdot-ed' this would be it.