I'm going to bring to the attention this paragraph from the article,
"No such deal exists with YouTube. But it's not too much of a stretch to imagine that, if Google's experiment goes well, YouTube might adopt a similar model. For now, [i]YouTube and the NBA have agreed to share advertising that runs alongside [/i]the NBA clips and [i]videos of fans showing off their best basketball moves.[/i]"
And doesn't the highlighted section alarm you?
Where is all of this hate coming from, sir or madam?
It seems to me, that whenever an article on a contraversial subject is posted (often concerning the government or something of close relation, mind you), that we throw on the cowboy hats and have ourselves a good ol' fashioned flame war. With the insults, lack of argumentsm and anger, the flaming joker, in his demonstration for his contempt of democracy, the instigative clowns, out there on the interweb all support a similar, universal conclusion. They are in direct opposition to the "quiet majorities". The ones who don't have not a thing to add to the thread topic, because the important aspects of his democratic official is of concent with him... and this is where I get off the track a bit but, the facts of my point the matter are in thereabouts.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm going to bring to the attention this paragraph from the article, "No such deal exists with YouTube. But it's not too much of a stretch to imagine that, if Google's experiment goes well, YouTube might adopt a similar model. For now, [i]YouTube and the NBA have agreed to share advertising that runs alongside [/i]the NBA clips and [i]videos of fans showing off their best basketball moves.[/i]" And doesn't the highlighted section alarm you?
Where is all of this hate coming from, sir or madam? It seems to me, that whenever an article on a contraversial subject is posted (often concerning the government or something of close relation, mind you), that we throw on the cowboy hats and have ourselves a good ol' fashioned flame war. With the insults, lack of argumentsm and anger, the flaming joker, in his demonstration for his contempt of democracy, the instigative clowns, out there on the interweb all support a similar, universal conclusion. They are in direct opposition to the "quiet majorities". The ones who don't have not a thing to add to the thread topic, because the important aspects of his democratic official is of concent with him... and this is where I get off the track a bit but, the facts of my point the matter are in thereabouts.