I searched the CVE and found the following results within the same time period that Symantec did there report:
HP-UX 14 vulnerabilities
OS X 5 vulnerabilities
Microsoft Windows 59 vlnerabilities
Solaris 8 vulnerabilities
A search of US-CERT produces the following results:
HP-UX 14 vulnerabilities
OS X 1454 vulnerabilities
Microsoft Windows 459 vulnerabilities
Solaris 28 vulnerabilities
These were the exact terms I searched
Now think why a security company would overinflate that amount of ulnerabilities that have been found in various operating systems, perhaps because they sell security products and it is in the interest of their business model?
Slashdot Mirror
I searched the CVE and found the following results within the same time period that Symantec did there report:
HP-UX 14 vulnerabilities
OS X 5 vulnerabilities
Microsoft Windows 59 vlnerabilities
Solaris 8 vulnerabilities
A search of US-CERT produces the following results:
HP-UX 14 vulnerabilities
OS X 1454 vulnerabilities
Microsoft Windows 459 vulnerabilities
Solaris 28 vulnerabilities
These were the exact terms I searched
Now think why a security company would overinflate that amount of ulnerabilities that have been found in various operating systems, perhaps because they sell security products and it is in the interest of their business model?