The "AGW movement" is not censoring papers. Do you understand what "peer review" means when it comes to getting papers published is reputable science journals. If your paper doesn't come up to the necessary scientific standards, it does not get published, unless, as in the CRU situation, the reviewer (a single editor in this case) is also not up to snuff and allows your junk paper to be published anyway. Bottomline--peer review is not censorship, it is quality control.
Slashdot Mirror
The "AGW movement" is not censoring papers. Do you understand what "peer review" means when it comes to getting papers published is reputable science journals. If your paper doesn't come up to the necessary scientific standards, it does not get published, unless, as in the CRU situation, the reviewer (a single editor in this case) is also not up to snuff and allows your junk paper to be published anyway. Bottomline--peer review is not censorship, it is quality control.