On Monday slashdot.org posted my study regarding the significant financial fraud now occurring at the Microsoft Corporation. Since then I have received many thoughtful comments on how I might improve the quality of both the message delivery and the message itself. You have a fine community and I sincerely appreciate the feedback. I will post an update but for now try to address the three most common comments: 1) You have no hard facts. Do access the spreadsheet and review the numbers and assumptions. These are right off the SEC Edgar database 10K (annual) and 10Q (quarterly)reports. I will include a q and a that shows exactly how to recompute the tax deduction Microsoft is taking. Most top CPA's and money managers do not understand this and frankly I have often been asked how in the world I figured this whole thing out. My hope is that when you read the q and a you will be more qualified than them to speak on this issue, whether you are a programmer or a gardner. 2) You say "I" so much and sound egotistical and arrogant. The truth is that I am more support oriented and have no need to stroke my ego. A common comment I have received from those who have seen my report over the last year is an intense frustration at all the various media stories done off its contents yet no attribution. Top reporters say things like, keep it coming Bill, yet they never provide any credit. This credit is not wanted for my ego but rather to help others get to the source. As you all know, Microsoft is a master at distorting other peoples work. Some might use the word corrupting. Imagine also how I feel as an investment advisor, seeing teachers and many seniors sucked into the pyramid each week. 3) Edit more. Will do. 4) Personal insults. It is surprisingly easy to see the dishonest Microsoft advocates in the forums. They always start with a personal attack and then deviate into cryptic comments regarding "dillution." The viciousness is sad and I might suggest to slashdot.org that you eliminate all comments that insult others. Maintaining civility in the discussions could be a key thing distinguishing you from other internet based forums. 4) What do you know about Linux. While having a black and tan beer last night I was thinking about that name slashdot and it finally hit me. It's been more than 10 years since I used Unix, a Sun version which had some great features for file transfers, etc. I might an ideal person to help you elevate your effort. Some of you might consider trying to pull me into your group via a speaking opportunity at a convention, etc. This might provide an opportunity for me to provide some thoughts on the technology related matters in addition discussing my study and the implications and opportunities it poses for other technology firms. Your well thought criticism are very very much apprecaited. Thanks again and you might listen to the Jeff Rense interview for a little more background on the fraud issue at Microsoft, a link to which is available on my site. Sincerely, Bill Parish www.billparish.com
Slashdot Mirror
On Monday slashdot.org posted my study regarding the significant financial fraud now occurring at the Microsoft Corporation. Since then I have received many thoughtful comments on how I might improve the quality of both the message delivery and the message itself. You have a fine community and I sincerely appreciate the feedback. I will post an update but for now try to address the three most common comments: 1) You have no hard facts. Do access the spreadsheet and review the numbers and assumptions. These are right off the SEC Edgar database 10K (annual) and 10Q (quarterly)reports. I will include a q and a that shows exactly how to recompute the tax deduction Microsoft is taking. Most top CPA's and money managers do not understand this and frankly I have often been asked how in the world I figured this whole thing out. My hope is that when you read the q and a you will be more qualified than them to speak on this issue, whether you are a programmer or a gardner. 2) You say "I" so much and sound egotistical and arrogant. The truth is that I am more support oriented and have no need to stroke my ego. A common comment I have received from those who have seen my report over the last year is an intense frustration at all the various media stories done off its contents yet no attribution. Top reporters say things like, keep it coming Bill, yet they never provide any credit. This credit is not wanted for my ego but rather to help others get to the source. As you all know, Microsoft is a master at distorting other peoples work. Some might use the word corrupting. Imagine also how I feel as an investment advisor, seeing teachers and many seniors sucked into the pyramid each week. 3) Edit more. Will do. 4) Personal insults. It is surprisingly easy to see the dishonest Microsoft advocates in the forums. They always start with a personal attack and then deviate into cryptic comments regarding "dillution." The viciousness is sad and I might suggest to slashdot.org that you eliminate all comments that insult others. Maintaining civility in the discussions could be a key thing distinguishing you from other internet based forums. 4) What do you know about Linux. While having a black and tan beer last night I was thinking about that name slashdot and it finally hit me. It's been more than 10 years since I used Unix, a Sun version which had some great features for file transfers, etc. I might an ideal person to help you elevate your effort. Some of you might consider trying to pull me into your group via a speaking opportunity at a convention, etc. This might provide an opportunity for me to provide some thoughts on the technology related matters in addition discussing my study and the implications and opportunities it poses for other technology firms. Your well thought criticism are very very much apprecaited. Thanks again and you might listen to the Jeff Rense interview for a little more background on the fraud issue at Microsoft, a link to which is available on my site. Sincerely, Bill Parish www.billparish.com