LA Noire, IIRC, was handed the GTA engine on a platter,
You don't remember correctly. LA Noire started being developed in 2003 which was 3 years before the initial release of the RAGE engine. The only way they could have been "handed the GTA engine on a platter" was through having a time machine.
You do realize that the development started 3 years before they were ever part of Take Two, right? They weren't "re-implementing" anything since there was no engine for them to be given.
So basically you're just a nutter ignoring the fact that he has previous sexual assault charges made against him long before he was ever going to be part of IMF and has a history of shady womanizing. No, clearly he couldn't possibly have done anything wrong despite his history. No, it's all a US government plot! IT HAS TO BE!!!
It seems that her successor, who was critical of the value of the U.S. dollar and pulling ahead of the polls in the French election, suddenly decided to take up a new career in sexual assault at a New York hotel.
Ignoring the other sexual assault charge from a woman many years ago as well as his long history of womanizing? Those were also US plots to discredit him, too, right?
If I recall Google has a 30 minute return policy on apps.
Which is total bullshit considering there have been many cases when I've fought for well more than 30 minutes just to get an app to download and install.
No. There are two parts of the Android market. There is the "paid" part and the "free" part. They are distinct parts and thus Google has removed the "paid" apps part of the market.
Except it's not just enterprises. Tons of average users are getting headaches over this as well when suddenly an unjustified version jump is making it so their plugins get disabled.
I'm pretty sure the GP's post was entirely ironic considering the premise of the article. Basically this person is whining about "fake" geeks co-opting the term when in fact the supposed "real" geeks stole the terms from the prior "real" geeks.
Why would anyone appreciate someone who bites the heads off of chickens? Oh right, the story is apparently only referring to fake geeks not actual geeks (carnival performers who do gross acts).
Because people don't feel like wasting days and weeks of times going through a complicated bureaucracy just to make simple edits to wikipedia? Not all of us are so devoid of lives that we can waste on that time arguing with people.
Your scenario is completely different. There are even case law rulings to back up the fact that public servants in public do not have a right to privacy. These states and cities who abuse wiretapping laws to stop people from taking public videos of cops should be punished for gross misuse of the legal system.
Slashdot Mirror
Because books do not have unlimited pages to include a discussion of every topic under the sun?
I was trying to make the poor guy feel better about himself rather than reminding him that his pecker is smaller than a toddler's.
So basically they will lose all of....1 person? OH NO HOW WILL THEY EVER SURVIVE?!?!?!?
LA Noire, IIRC, was handed the GTA engine on a platter,
You don't remember correctly. LA Noire started being developed in 2003 which was 3 years before the initial release of the RAGE engine. The only way they could have been "handed the GTA engine on a platter" was through having a time machine.
You do realize that the development started 3 years before they were ever part of Take Two, right? They weren't "re-implementing" anything since there was no engine for them to be given.
So basically you're just a nutter ignoring the fact that he has previous sexual assault charges made against him long before he was ever going to be part of IMF and has a history of shady womanizing. No, clearly he couldn't possibly have done anything wrong despite his history. No, it's all a US government plot! IT HAS TO BE!!!
It seems that her successor, who was critical of the value of the U.S. dollar and pulling ahead of the polls in the French election, suddenly decided to take up a new career in sexual assault at a New York hotel.
Ignoring the other sexual assault charge from a woman many years ago as well as his long history of womanizing? Those were also US plots to discredit him, too, right?
If I recall Google has a 30 minute return policy on apps.
Which is total bullshit considering there have been many cases when I've fought for well more than 30 minutes just to get an app to download and install.
The word is "off", not "of".
No. There are two parts of the Android market. There is the "paid" part and the "free" part. They are distinct parts and thus Google has removed the "paid" apps part of the market.
What happened to personal responsibility?
Such as having to take personal responsibility when caught trying to con people out of their money?
Yes, because it should be the users job to make sure their plugins continue to work through these pointless version number churn.
How about they use better development practices such as not breaking plugins for people by bumping a version number for no reason?
Except it's not just enterprises. Tons of average users are getting headaches over this as well when suddenly an unjustified version jump is making it so their plugins get disabled.
Opinion? How is it my opinion? That's what the term originally meant 300+ years ago long before computer nerds co-opted the term.
I'm pretty sure the GP's post was entirely ironic considering the premise of the article. Basically this person is whining about "fake" geeks co-opting the term when in fact the supposed "real" geeks stole the terms from the prior "real" geeks.
"Real" geeks are carnies who do things like bite off a chicken's head. Anything else is a fake geek.
Why would anyone appreciate someone who bites the heads off of chickens? Oh right, the story is apparently only referring to fake geeks not actual geeks (carnival performers who do gross acts).
Because people don't feel like wasting days and weeks of times going through a complicated bureaucracy just to make simple edits to wikipedia? Not all of us are so devoid of lives that we can waste on that time arguing with people.
Of which you failed to link to.
It has 200 million actual users.
And you say this based on what? That Opera claims it as so?
Your scenario is completely different. There are even case law rulings to back up the fact that public servants in public do not have a right to privacy. These states and cities who abuse wiretapping laws to stop people from taking public videos of cops should be punished for gross misuse of the legal system.
How does Apple force Safari on iPhone users when you can trivially easily replace that browser with dozens of other choices with a few clicks?
What does the fact that you bite the heads off of chickens have to do with my question?
Woot mdsolar is posting another article about nuclear power to spread more FUD!!!
What would be the point? 2 versions of an irrelevant browser?