Slashdot Mirror


User: Jansingal

Jansingal's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
345
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 345

  1. Re:Who will advocate change? on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    dell gives you an option to have the workstation come with xp as opposed to vista.

  2. Re:as the review says on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    that's not coding, that's documentation :)

    not sure a huge error in my mind.

  3. Re:as the review says on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    >>Designing a serious bridge is a LOT more difficult than 90% of software projects out there.

    I would up that to 95%

  4. Re:OT: Drunk driving on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    >>> In the USA, drunk driving is NOT tolerated
    Sorry u are sooo wrong. 50 people a day being killed in drunk driving accidents in 2007 and how many get off with no jail time?

  5. Re:as the review says on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    dude, talk to civil engineers working on government project, you will see how wrong you are.
    My sister in laws brother worked for a very large state agency and she left on agony over such burocracy, project mismanagement, and more.

  6. Re:Nothing's going to change on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    >>Now as a consultant, I face the same struggle getting people to be serious about backups, redundancy/eliminating single points of failure...

    shows how irrational people are.

  7. Re:as the review says on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    >>Bridge building isnt really all that complex,

    What, the bridge to your bathroom?

    you have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about, zero.

    do u realize how many scientists, engineers, etc., it takes to build a large bridge?

  8. Re:Bashful Kidney on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    ....and the point of you sharing that piece of your health is????????????

  9. Re:Getting in ahead of the crowd... on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    >>""This book could be summed up in three words: 'don't use windows'""

    That is silly.

    go into places that use unix/linux and you will see people who also don't know squat about writing secure code.

    A good coder can make windows secure.
    A slacker can ensure that SecureBSD is insecure.

  10. Re:Factual Error! on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    Thats a really really bad analogy,and even worse logic.

    We need secure software because of the repercussions of poorly written code.

    Misspelling the name of a desperate singer in search of publicity has no repercussions.

  11. Re:Factual Error! on Geekonomics · · Score: 1

    I take that as a compliment for the guy :)

    Shows the difference between slashdot and tmz.com

    The truth is there is nothing factual about her. It is all hype.

  12. Re:Qualifications... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    thanX!

  13. Re:Qualifications... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    jayshreesingala@gmail.com

  14. Re:Sounds like my 2nd phone interview with Google. on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    did u get the job?

  15. Re:Qualifications... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    Under what name do you write?

  16. Re:you can't flunk a security interview on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    point well taken

  17. Re:Obligatory Project Manager joke... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    Only a veteran could come up with such a joke, so true a joke!

  18. Re:Qualifications... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    >>>and a published author

    what did you write?

  19. Re:you can't flunk a security interview on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    apparently (756613),

    you are much more to the point than I :)

    Jay

  20. Re:you can't flunk a security interview on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    Dude, you are soooo wrong!!!

    What do you mean that there are no standards in IT security? Ever hear of ISO-17799? There are standards from NIST, VISA and tons more.

    >>>You can't say "I'm trained in the XYZ" methodology.

    Sure you can!!! There are security methodologies that train people.

    >>The only underlying principle in IT security is "Deny everything to everyone all the time" (Is there an acronym for that?)

    That is a sub principle in the methodologies you just denied existed :)

    >>>Here's the really good bit: the interviewer can't ask you questions about your past experience or clients, because that's confidential.

    Sure they can! They can't ask names, but you can talk about technologies, projects, etc.

    >>>If pressed you just need to say that "You wouldn't want me to talk to future employers about your security setup, so you must respect previous clients' confidentiality".

    And if the candidate said that, I would kick him out!!!!

    >>>>Now if you think this leads to:

    It is not that bad!

    Jay

  21. Re:I remember cleary a Price Waterhouse interview on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    That must have been years ago during the internet era.

    The folks at PWC still have their head in their air, but that are not THAT POMPOUS, at least the ones that have been in our firm.

  22. Re:Obligatory Project Manager joke... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    Hey, I think I am going to tell this joke during the interview.

    If they laugh hysterically, they are hired on the spot.
    If they don't think it's funny, then they really lack experience and are not invited back for further interviews.

  23. Re:Rain, Parades, and Outsourcing on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    Not really.

    We all know how incompetant the Bangalore/Mumbai call centers are. they are good at basic tech support.

    but things like app level security, crypto, authentication... neva!!!!

    your security job is safe in the US of A dudes!

  24. Re:My interview process.... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 1

    which are...????

  25. Re:My interview process.... on IT Security Interviews Exposed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, and Swordfish was a terrible movie.

    Lousy and unrealistic plot.