Re:Good review
on
Clean Code
·
· Score: -1, Redundant
Wow, a good comment.
I usually skip over the comments, because I find that they're filled with inside jokes and wandering monologues, but in this case, the comment was well-written, thoughtful.
Still waiting for your reply.....
Tell me what has to be done for this/. crit review?
of course, this is not an english course, this is a tech site, critical reviews should not be mandatory.
dude, he liked the book and wrote about it. what the deal? if he or another reviewer didn't like it, they would be more critical.
Get this: this is/., not the ny times books review.
Slashdot Mirror
what is elo?
dojo would win hands down, no question!
the reason he gives short answers to the media is that is all they can handle.
do you have anything, any source, whatsoever to back up anything you have written?
i guess that is why you are asked to speak at so many conferences, write so much, since you know more than he?
seems like so many postings here are from those who are jealous of bruce.
ok, i see.
but well, his topics are very very current and timely.
name 1 thing he has written that is not.
why did you reply to such a dtupid posting. guy is an idouit for such a comment.
>>>Terrorism is a symptom of very desperate people who feel that they're being shit on by someone.
which shoes how clueless you are. dumb comment.
so you are both angry at bruce and jeaolous of his success!
touche!!!!
:) good point!!!
Wow, a good comment. I usually skip over the comments, because I find that they're filled with inside jokes and wandering monologues, but in this case, the comment was well-written, thoughtful.
not so, I saw you already! :)
Still waiting for your reply..... Tell me what has to be done for this /. crit review?
of course, this is not an english course, this is a tech site, critical reviews should not be mandatory.
that is not an answer. Please give me a serious answer.
perhaps I do, serisouly, englighten me.
NO!!!NO!!!NO!!!NO!!!NO!!! this is not the place for critical hyper critical reviews. whats so hard bout that?
all the /. book reviews are like that, get used to it.
well, most are.
dude, he liked the book and wrote about it. what the deal? if he or another reviewer didn't like it, they would be more critical. Get this: this is /., not the ny times books review.
he got off once, and he never learnt his lesson
Just answer the damn question, what do you want it to be? There are many ways to write a book review. Do you suggest a single standard manner?
FRSL (first rate scum layers)
>>Hint: a review isn't a summary. More hints please.,.. what should it be?
OJ's team were not first rate, they were unethical.
also, in the spirit of correct English... should you not have chosen a better heading??