So now it's tagging and registering too. And what will you now propose to make sure the person who did it was actually licensed and actually bothered to file a flight plan. How many years in the slam do you propose for unlawful possession of a common child's toy?
It's not like they can't respond at all, they just need to avoid shooting the dog and blowing the house up until they see some evidence that something is actually going on. Stuff they really should be doing anyway.
There is room to question the amount, but surely in a defective product suit, a coupon for a small discount on an identically defective product is inadequate (and very probably profitable for the defendant if anyone uses it).
And yet, in 50 years there has been 2 notable incidents. Unlike the can opener. Or, for instancwe the lawnmower. Shall we licence lawnmowers? They can throw debris quite far and cause injuries to others. Or chainsaws? We had an idiot in the neighborhood knock power out for a day when he didn't look before he cut. Live wires on the ground and everything.
What about kites? I have flown kites quite high before. I even had to take evasive action once when a small plane was nearby (I was flying from the top of a small mountain at the time). Had I been less responsible, that could have gone badly.
Meanwhile, A license isn't terribly heavy, I'm sure it won't do much to slow someone down if they choose to run away if something bad happens.
Arguably, it is taking possession of private property without due process of law. Also note that the Bill of Rights applies to the government wherever it is, not just to citizens within the borders.
If you dig deep enough in most of those absurdist situations, you'll find that for each perverse rule the union demands, there is a corresponding attempt by management to screw the union that resulted in that rule.
In the database situation, perhaps the point was to make the management get what they pay for and someone was dragging their feet in hiring enough people at the agreed rate of pay.
The guys on standby were probably the result of a chronically understaffed department in the past.
There are much more egregious cases though. For example, a million plaintiffs owed $100 each. Company settles for 6 million to the lawyers and 1 million $10 off coupons on the same crappy product that caused the suit.
The studies showed that the mechanism of action seems to be that the neonicotinoids render the hives more susceptible to common parasites. So if those parasites are less common somewhere, CCD will also be less common even in the presence of neonicotinoids.
That still suggests that wherever the parasites are common, the neonicotinoids should not be used.
Well, yeah, he swore he would kill her, he was holding the gun that shot her to death and was standing over her dead body, and OK, the gun was still warm from firing and sure, there was nobody else around within a 20 mile radius, but I swear, he's totally innocent!
They showed the stuff causes CCD, nobody disputes that it is used on crops. We already know that CCD is a bad thing, so we have enough reason to stop using it. They're saying hemlock is poisonous to humans, here is Socrates dead and this half empty cup contains hemlock. The correct conclusion is not that he died of old age.
I could see the potential need for further restrictions on where it can be flown beyond line of sight or autonomously but that's about the limit of it.
What wonderland do you live in? There are people who really really want the CPI to look rosier than reality. That's why it leans on things that are dropping in price but are totally unnecessary like large LCD TVs but it underweights food, clothing, and shelter as well as medical care.
Treatment for meth addiction, sure. Incarceration followed by unemployability? No. It serves no constructive purpose whatsoever. If anything, it perpetuates drug addiction and involvement in criminal enterprise.
The 'floodgates' on marijuana opened a few years ago in some states and I see no signs of the apocalypse. I see no accumulating evidence of much of anything. More and more states are legalizing it now, and smugglers in Mexico are complaining that they cannot compete with the peaceful legal farmers up north.
There has been 1 or 2 notable incidents since the invention of R/C planes half a century ago, period. And it amounted to nothing at that. Further, it is covered under existing law, it just wasn't enforced. Might as well licence the use of a can opener (which, unlike this, has actually resulted in injuries requiring medical treatment).
The problem with regulating and licensing everything is that you eventually need a lawyer just to walk in the park. I am certainly not opposed to regulation in general, I just like to see it kept simple and only where necessary/useful.
Surely you left out volume 12, chapter 32, section 5, sub section A, subsection 32/j line 5 of the 2013 edition where it clearly states that the warranty is void where prohibited unless you have written permission of major league baseball witnessed by a moose, a bear (except for polar bears unles on an alternate tuesday after a full moon during a rain storm) and an antelope.
Or we could just stick with don't fly near the airport.
Slashdot Mirror
So now it's tagging and registering too. And what will you now propose to make sure the person who did it was actually licensed and actually bothered to file a flight plan. How many years in the slam do you propose for unlawful possession of a common child's toy?
It's not like they can't respond at all, they just need to avoid shooting the dog and blowing the house up until they see some evidence that something is actually going on. Stuff they really should be doing anyway.
Where does it say that? It is a series of affirmative restraints on our government.
There is room to question the amount, but surely in a defective product suit, a coupon for a small discount on an identically defective product is inadequate (and very probably profitable for the defendant if anyone uses it).
Agreed. It's part of why things are so thoroughly tilted in favor of the super rich.
And yet, in 50 years there has been 2 notable incidents. Unlike the can opener. Or, for instancwe the lawnmower. Shall we licence lawnmowers? They can throw debris quite far and cause injuries to others. Or chainsaws? We had an idiot in the neighborhood knock power out for a day when he didn't look before he cut. Live wires on the ground and everything.
What about kites? I have flown kites quite high before. I even had to take evasive action once when a small plane was nearby (I was flying from the top of a small mountain at the time). Had I been less responsible, that could have gone badly.
Meanwhile, A license isn't terribly heavy, I'm sure it won't do much to slow someone down if they choose to run away if something bad happens.
Arguably, it is taking possession of private property without due process of law. Also note that the Bill of Rights applies to the government wherever it is, not just to citizens within the borders.
Google "Radioactive Boy Scout". There is no need to steal guarded U-233 to make a dirty bomb.
In that case, you REALLY don't want to think about all those basements with radon gas or all those smoke detectors out there.
Meanwhile, I would suggest de-enriching that U233 and fueling a reactor with it. That way we get rid of it and we get energy.
If you are working for a paycheck, guess what? You are working class.
If you dig deep enough in most of those absurdist situations, you'll find that for each perverse rule the union demands, there is a corresponding attempt by management to screw the union that resulted in that rule.
In the database situation, perhaps the point was to make the management get what they pay for and someone was dragging their feet in hiring enough people at the agreed rate of pay.
The guys on standby were probably the result of a chronically understaffed department in the past.
There are much more egregious cases though. For example, a million plaintiffs owed $100 each. Company settles for 6 million to the lawyers and 1 million $10 off coupons on the same crappy product that caused the suit.
That was well explained in TFA. The insecticide leaves them much more vulnerable to parasites (if any) that might attack them.
The studies showed that the mechanism of action seems to be that the neonicotinoids render the hives more susceptible to common parasites. So if those parasites are less common somewhere, CCD will also be less common even in the presence of neonicotinoids.
That still suggests that wherever the parasites are common, the neonicotinoids should not be used.
How about they show happy shiny white families dying of starvation?
Well, yeah, he swore he would kill her, he was holding the gun that shot her to death and was standing over her dead body, and OK, the gun was still warm from firing and sure, there was nobody else around within a 20 mile radius, but I swear, he's totally innocent!
They showed the stuff causes CCD, nobody disputes that it is used on crops. We already know that CCD is a bad thing, so we have enough reason to stop using it. They're saying hemlock is poisonous to humans, here is Socrates dead and this half empty cup contains hemlock. The correct conclusion is not that he died of old age.
To what end? Why is the line needed or useful?
I could see the potential need for further restrictions on where it can be flown beyond line of sight or autonomously but that's about the limit of it.
What wonderland do you live in? There are people who really really want the CPI to look rosier than reality. That's why it leans on things that are dropping in price but are totally unnecessary like large LCD TVs but it underweights food, clothing, and shelter as well as medical care.
Treatment for meth addiction, sure. Incarceration followed by unemployability? No. It serves no constructive purpose whatsoever. If anything, it perpetuates drug addiction and involvement in criminal enterprise.
The 'floodgates' on marijuana opened a few years ago in some states and I see no signs of the apocalypse. I see no accumulating evidence of much of anything. More and more states are legalizing it now, and smugglers in Mexico are complaining that they cannot compete with the peaceful legal farmers up north.
There has been 1 or 2 notable incidents since the invention of R/C planes half a century ago, period. And it amounted to nothing at that. Further, it is covered under existing law, it just wasn't enforced. Might as well licence the use of a can opener (which, unlike this, has actually resulted in injuries requiring medical treatment).
The problem with regulating and licensing everything is that you eventually need a lawyer just to walk in the park. I am certainly not opposed to regulation in general, I just like to see it kept simple and only where necessary/useful.
Surely you left out volume 12, chapter 32, section 5, sub section A, subsection 32/j line 5 of the 2013 edition where it clearly states that the warranty is void where prohibited unless you have written permission of major league baseball witnessed by a moose, a bear (except for polar bears unles on an alternate tuesday after a full moon during a rain storm) and an antelope.
Or we could just stick with don't fly near the airport.
In other words, the people who fail to yield, which is not what an Idaho stop is.
Lithium batteries pack a punch, but not nearly as much as you seem to believe.
That's great for China but does nothing for Japan, the U.S. or Europe.
So the real problem is terrorists with trained pigeons.