if I wasn't a slash dot reader since the 90s how would I know what the sync is and that there was a slashdot radio show on it. I just don't participate in the forums because it's generaly filled with fools. you should check your facts because you got a ot of them wrong in your comment.
rachel did serve the underaged girl beer. then the under aged girl served her a DMCA notice.
I think the ultimate amazing move she did was take a for reals birth cert from some guy for being "annoying."
she did take the picture and the DMCA notice only claimed ownership of the picture in the ID and the signature. see my comment below. I helped her file the DMCA notice.
Hi I'm Mark. I've been a slash dot reader since slash dot radio on the sync in the 90s.
I am friends with the ID owner. I told her since she owned the copyright to the picture and signature on the card that she could invoke the DMCA. Rachel seems to be under the impression that the card holder is claiming ownership to the card which she is not,just the image and the signature. I think the DMCA is a awful law, but it is the law. I see this as activism to illustrate how bad the DMCA is. But I must say it feels good to use a law purchased by large corporate interests for personal use.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't care what side you're on "vigilante bartender" has got to be the greatest title ever. Rachel should totally adopt it.
if I wasn't a slash dot reader since the 90s how would I know what the sync is and that there was a slashdot radio show on it. I just don't participate in the forums because it's generaly filled with fools. you should check your facts because you got a ot of them wrong in your comment.
rachel did serve the underaged girl beer. then the under aged girl served her a DMCA notice. I think the ultimate amazing move she did was take a for reals birth cert from some guy for being "annoying."
she did take the picture and the DMCA notice only claimed ownership of the picture in the ID and the signature. see my comment below. I helped her file the DMCA notice.
Hi I'm Mark. I've been a slash dot reader since slash dot radio on the sync in the 90s. I am friends with the ID owner. I told her since she owned the copyright to the picture and signature on the card that she could invoke the DMCA. Rachel seems to be under the impression that the card holder is claiming ownership to the card which she is not,just the image and the signature. I think the DMCA is a awful law, but it is the law. I see this as activism to illustrate how bad the DMCA is. But I must say it feels good to use a law purchased by large corporate interests for personal use.