Looks to me like they should approach this by making an 'osi approved' sticker to stamp the software, rather than saying that 'open source' is the 'osi approved' sticker.
I can understand their concern - as people tend to label open source as 'good' where there may be a clause in something that is claiming to be open which charges you loads of money..
Slashdot Mirror
Looks to me like they should approach this by making an 'osi approved' sticker to stamp the software, rather than saying that 'open source' is the 'osi approved' sticker. I can understand their concern - as people tend to label open source as 'good' where there may be a clause in something that is claiming to be open which charges you loads of money..