← Back to Users
VGAfreak's activity in the archive.
I mean, I've been checking out the reviews out there... For example, http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39580/ http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39603/ http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39605/ http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39635/ http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1335&Itemid=1/ http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1325&Itemid=1/ http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1336&Itemid=1/ http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1337&Itemid=1/ http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/r60 0-architecture.html/ http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2988 / http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/ I see that everyone came to pretty much same results. I'm not sure this "HD2900XT" thing will be repairable. I think that perhaps AMD's announcement that they're targeting best-buy in high-end is more valid. Although that one might have been said in pure desparation....
Actually, it seems as though IT-review.net actually did the whole shabbang of testing on various platforms, check these: http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1335&Itemid=1 http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1325&Itemid=1 http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1336&Itemid=1 http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1337&Itemid=1 Also included, some links to other big websites with pretty much the same results: http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39580 http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39603 http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39605 http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39635 http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/r60 0-architecture.html http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2988 http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/
Slashdot Mirror
I mean, I've been checking out the reviews out there... For example, http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39580/
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39603/
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39605/
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39635/
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1335&Itemid=1/
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1325&Itemid=1/
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1336&Itemid=1/
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1337&Itemid=1/
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/r60 0-architecture.html/
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2988 /
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/
I see that everyone came to pretty much same results. I'm not sure this "HD2900XT" thing will be repairable. I think that perhaps AMD's announcement that they're targeting best-buy in high-end is more valid. Although that one might have been said in pure
desparation....
Actually, it seems as though IT-review.net actually did the whole shabbang of testing on various platforms, check these: http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1335&Itemid=1
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1325&Itemid=1
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1336&Itemid=1
http://it-review.net/index.php?option=com_content& task=view&id=1337&Itemid=1
Also included, some links to other big websites with pretty much the same results:
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39580
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39603
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39605
http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=39635
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/r60 0-architecture.html
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2988
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_2900_XT/