It's not my job to make you respect my belief system. It is also not anyone else's job to make me respect theirs. Someday I am sure you will have enough confidence in your own belief system that you also do not feel the need to make other people respect your beliefs.
Way to go. Just to help you out I would like to point out a small flaw in your attempt at equivalency. Wanting to be able to trust in your doctors decision about your medical care and neither you nor your doctor being able to make a decision about care because of what congress wants are not the same. If on the other hand you feel that the US government is better able to make decisions about your health care than you or your doctor I encourage you to turn your care over to them. But just because you feel that you and your doctor are incapable of rational though is no reason to rob me of my freedoms.
Wow. I never thought about it like that. I guess murdering people over stupid shit in large mobs is just an alternative type of society. Nothing inherently wrong with it. Just different. Thank you for fixing me.
Never said they were all in favor of it. How many Muslims were dragged out of their houses and killed in the US after the 9-11 attacks? I just want to get the actual facts behind the FUD you just threw out there.
Hmm. Point 1: Laptop batteries from many manufacturers blew up. Points 2 - 5: 100% correct fuck Sony. Point 6: Umm. That is just capitalism. Demand jumps way up you raise the price and make good profit. Nothing wrong with that. It is not like they are price gouging on Fuel or Food or something that people need.
Hmmm. I do not recall saying that. Maybe that is just something you added into my comment in your head so you could feel better? Not sure. I do not think that burning books is good. Especially if it is done as a form of censorship. I was pointing out that even with the extremists in the Christian religions. When a picture of a crucifix with Christ on it was shown as art in a jar of urine no one died. People were offended. People spoke out against it. People talked and argued about if it was in fact art of just a little punk saying fuck you to religion. People got angry. No one Died. No one called for the killing of all artists. No mobs came out and destroyed neighborhoods. Think about that.
Everyone says their country is better and that the others are backwards and losers.
I agree. Although if you are a member of a country where large numbers of people take to the streets and people must die because a book got accidentally burnt or a picture of your prophet was drawn. Then I would say that your country has some growing up to do.
Sounds to me like on your phone developers that do a better job are more likely to be installed on your phone. So.... Nothing broken here. All is working as intended.
But users cannot sanely determine whether they should give the app permissions, unless the app explains why it wants those permissions.
Yes they can. If I want an App and I have questions about why it needs certain permissions I can ask. Most market Apps have comments about permissions. Sometimes just looking I can get the answer. If I need to ask the developer then my download can wait till I have my answers.
If I install a clock widget and it asks for permissions to send text messages to pay numbers, I don't trust it. If the clock description lists a feature to send text messages to another phone when a user-defined timer goes off, I might trust it. (And it would take more than just that description to make me trust it.)
Exactly. I do not really know what your problem is. In 90% of my downloads a quick check of the permissions it asks for and the comments section lets me know if I should download or not. the other 10% might require a little effort on my part. If for some reason the app at its best in my mind is not worth the effort then "fuck it". I do not need to tell others how to run their shit.
It is not. Not that I know of. The point I was making was that the programmer gets to determine what permissions he wants. The user gets to determine if he wants to give that stuff up to have the app. This is not only how it works but in reality it is exactly as it should work. The only times that you have problems are when a user screams "I did not read it!" or when a user screams "I want the stuff you made but I want it how I want it! Just give it to me anyway!". In both of those cases I am ok with the user getting screwed.
Also the reason that a QR code reader may want full access to your contacts list is because most of them will read contact QR code. One click and full contact information for a person is added to you list.
Why should you have that power. If I write an app and to pay for it I put ads out you have the right to install it or not. As long as it is made clear what I have access to, If you do not like it then do not install my app. Being able to install my app in any way you want on a free app is not a "right" that you have. You are really going to blame Android for telling you what an ap wants and asking if you really want the program?
How much are you paid to make Android seem the same as iOS here?
If I won a company I do not OWE you a job. You do not OWE me work. If you work for me and I am happy with the work you do I will continue to pay you. If you are doing a really good job and have the ability to make more money working somewhere else it may be to my benefit to pay you more to keep you there. If I notice that paying a little more than I have to to keep you around results in even better performance and even more money for me you will get paid better again. If you start fucking off and making me wish I never owned a business in the first place I will make you gone.
No I am just assuming that those who do and don't are not heavily weighted by the D or R. If you want to assume that more Rs are lying bastards and more Ds donate a lot and refuses to report it then I guess that would be your belief.
To be fair Will was just acting the part given to him. If you want to place blame I would put it on the director and the screenplay writers. They are they problem with that movie.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not my job to make you respect my belief system. It is also not anyone else's job to make me respect theirs.
Someday I am sure you will have enough confidence in your own belief system that you also do not feel the need to make other people respect your beliefs.
Nope. But I hear that they have added it to the DSM V.
HOAs are for commie bastards.
Way to go.
Just to help you out I would like to point out a small flaw in your attempt at equivalency.
Wanting to be able to trust in your doctors decision about your medical care and neither you nor your doctor being able to make a decision about care because of what congress wants are not the same.
If on the other hand you feel that the US government is better able to make decisions about your health care than you or your doctor I encourage you to turn your care over to them.
But just because you feel that you and your doctor are incapable of rational though is no reason to rob me of my freedoms.
Wow. I never thought about it like that.
I guess murdering people over stupid shit in large mobs is just an alternative type of society. Nothing inherently wrong with it. Just different. Thank you for fixing me.
Been here quite a while. But thanks for the welcome anyway.
Any cool ass magic will be indistinguishable from sufficiently advanced technology.
And if man were meant to fly nature would have given him wings.
In other words....Fuck off.
Here is a blanket statement. I would think that all people when they are the ones who are sick would want the choice to be theirs not the governments.
Hmm.
Go back and read what I said about points 2 - 5.
Never said they were all in favor of it.
How many Muslims were dragged out of their houses and killed in the US after the 9-11 attacks?
I just want to get the actual facts behind the FUD you just threw out there.
Hmm.
Point 1: Laptop batteries from many manufacturers blew up.
Points 2 - 5: 100% correct fuck Sony.
Point 6: Umm. That is just capitalism. Demand jumps way up you raise the price and make good profit. Nothing wrong with that.
It is not like they are price gouging on Fuel or Food or something that people need.
Two words.
Commerce Clause
Hmmm.
I do not recall saying that. Maybe that is just something you added into my comment in your head so you could feel better?
Not sure. I do not think that burning books is good. Especially if it is done as a form of censorship. I was pointing out that even with the extremists in the Christian religions. When a picture of a crucifix with Christ on it was shown as art in a jar of urine no one died.
People were offended. People spoke out against it. People talked and argued about if it was in fact art of just a little punk saying fuck you to religion. People got angry. No one Died. No one called for the killing of all artists. No mobs came out and destroyed neighborhoods.
Think about that.
Everyone says their country is better and that the others are backwards and losers.
I agree.
Although if you are a member of a country where large numbers of people take to the streets and people must die because a book got accidentally burnt or a picture of your prophet was drawn. Then I would say that your country has some growing up to do.
Sounds to me like on your phone developers that do a better job are more likely to be installed on your phone.
So....
Nothing broken here. All is working as intended.
But users cannot sanely determine whether they should give the app permissions, unless the app explains why it wants those permissions.
Yes they can.
If I want an App and I have questions about why it needs certain permissions I can ask.
Most market Apps have comments about permissions. Sometimes just looking I can get the answer. If I need to ask the developer then my download can wait till I have my answers.
If I install a clock widget and it asks for permissions to send text messages to pay numbers, I don't trust it. If the clock description lists a feature to send text messages to another phone when a user-defined timer goes off, I might trust it. (And it would take more than just that description to make me trust it.)
Exactly.
I do not really know what your problem is. In 90% of my downloads a quick check of the permissions it asks for and the comments section lets me know if I should download or not. the other 10% might require a little effort on my part. If for some reason the app at its best in my mind is not worth the effort then "fuck it".
I do not need to tell others how to run their shit.
It is not.
Not that I know of.
The point I was making was that the programmer gets to determine what permissions he wants.
The user gets to determine if he wants to give that stuff up to have the app.
This is not only how it works but in reality it is exactly as it should work. The only times that you have problems are when a user screams "I did not read it!" or when a user screams "I want the stuff you made but I want it how I want it! Just give it to me anyway!".
In both of those cases I am ok with the user getting screwed.
Also the reason that a QR code reader may want full access to your contacts list is because most of them will read contact QR code. One click and full contact information for a person is added to you list.
Why should you have that power.
If I write an app and to pay for it I put ads out you have the right to install it or not.
As long as it is made clear what I have access to, If you do not like it then do not install my app.
Being able to install my app in any way you want on a free app is not a "right" that you have.
You are really going to blame Android for telling you what an ap wants and asking if you really want the program?
How much are you paid to make Android seem the same as iOS here?
If I won a company I do not OWE you a job. You do not OWE me work.
If you work for me and I am happy with the work you do I will continue to pay you.
If you are doing a really good job and have the ability to make more money working somewhere else it may be to my benefit to pay you more to keep you there.
If I notice that paying a little more than I have to to keep you around results in even better performance and even more money for me you will get paid better again.
If you start fucking off and making me wish I never owned a business in the first place I will make you gone.
No I am just assuming that those who do and don't are not heavily weighted by the D or R.
If you want to assume that more Rs are lying bastards and more Ds donate a lot and refuses to report it then I guess that would be your belief.
lol.
Oh well. Sometimes I type faster than I think.
The charitable donation metric is easily measured by tax returns.
To be fair Will was just acting the part given to him. If you want to place blame I would put it on the director and the screenplay writers.
They are they problem with that movie.