If you'd actually read the article, you'd notice that the breakdown photos are from Gizmodo, not Engadget. Engadget had some weak photos and Giz are the ones who showed the "many parts inside branded APPLE."
We would be far, far better off if everyone just put money into a savings account and used that money to pay medical bills. And hospitals and doctors were required to treat the people that didn't have the savings account and cost-shift it all over to the people that did.
Was this paragraph sarcasm? Cause that is basically what is going on with insurance and the rest of your post supports that the people with insurance pay for the people that don't. How would a savings account be any different?
The mere mention of the word censorship implies that you believe your rights have been stepped on 1st amendment or otherwise.
Please read the first word of the amendment. Congress. How does that apply to a private company? If I was a bookstore and didn't like you or the books you've theoretically authored, it'd be the same scenario.
Your third point has solely to do with the payment processing bank of the retailer. They often let the retailer determine the amount of verifications, I've had stuff shipped to previous address with an incorrect billing address on the receipt because the web forms kept messing up. I never understood it till I was setting up a payment service with a local bank and they asked me what verifications I wanted in place. It's amazing what little that you can do because they don't give a damn. Chargebacks go back to the retailer, with fees.
Discover does the same thing. A random number calling you from an automated system and asking you to call a 800 number that isn't their main number. No wonder people fall for phishing attacks via e-mail if this is how national banks act over the phone.
California, but I'd say that it's closer to 40 (more if we include skeptics that attend church services just to appease someone else). And maybe it's due to the 20s-30s age group too.
In WI, I am actually surprised at 20%. I've always felt like an outsider (admittedly not urban areas).
Well, according to daytime TV commercials, I'm pretty sure I can get rich for nearly any fraudulent lawsuit. All it takes is getting a sleazebag to see the potential. They won't get investigated and after barely passing the bar, no, they don't have brains.
Don't worry, if you hosted it on your own DSL line and it worked, the traffic was so low that nobody went to it anyways. Or you could read the part where it says the less than 1% of searches are being impacted.
Slashdot Mirror
Holy fuck, a tenth of a percent. I hope Wall Street is selling.
If you'd actually read the article, you'd notice that the breakdown photos are from Gizmodo, not Engadget. Engadget had some weak photos and Giz are the ones who showed the "many parts inside branded APPLE."
Greatest competitor? Who? EA or Sega in the older days? Redwood City isn't that big... Are you smokin the good stuff?
What carrier gave you the owner's information? I'd like to know so I can avoid whichever company apparently doesn't give a damn about privacy.
Or did you just give it to the store and they tossed it out with the nightly garbage?
More bars in more places?
AT&T sucks in the bay, so they've resorted to drinking establishments.
Brought to you by Carl's Jr.
We would be far, far better off if everyone just put money into a savings account and used that money to pay medical bills. And hospitals and doctors were required to treat the people that didn't have the savings account and cost-shift it all over to the people that did.
Was this paragraph sarcasm? Cause that is basically what is going on with insurance and the rest of your post supports that the people with insurance pay for the people that don't. How would a savings account be any different?
The mere mention of the word censorship implies that you believe your rights have been stepped on 1st amendment or otherwise.
Please read the first word of the amendment. Congress. How does that apply to a private company? If I was a bookstore and didn't like you or the books you've theoretically authored, it'd be the same scenario.
Your third point has solely to do with the payment processing bank of the retailer. They often let the retailer determine the amount of verifications, I've had stuff shipped to previous address with an incorrect billing address on the receipt because the web forms kept messing up. I never understood it till I was setting up a payment service with a local bank and they asked me what verifications I wanted in place. It's amazing what little that you can do because they don't give a damn. Chargebacks go back to the retailer, with fees.
Discover does the same thing. A random number calling you from an automated system and asking you to call a 800 number that isn't their main number. No wonder people fall for phishing attacks via e-mail if this is how national banks act over the phone.
We should control the banks in the US, since we basically own them via bailouts anyway.
Just like all the wonderful stuff they did with the CARD Act? Whatever they do will bite the consumer in the ass.
No, I can't rebut that accusation...
California, but I'd say that it's closer to 40 (more if we include skeptics that attend church services just to appease someone else). And maybe it's due to the 20s-30s age group too.
In WI, I am actually surprised at 20%. I've always felt like an outsider (admittedly not urban areas).
drunks, crossdressing and hitting people with swords.
So you're saying that we should archive /b/?
brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Depending on the geographical region of your anecdote, I'd peg it much higher.
Well, according to daytime TV commercials, I'm pretty sure I can get rich for nearly any fraudulent lawsuit. All it takes is getting a sleazebag to see the potential. They won't get investigated and after barely passing the bar, no, they don't have brains.
That happened to you too? I smell class action.
You can also get a drunk person at a bar who failed chemistry to put salt on their hand and then put an ice cube on top.
Not that I have any direct knowledge or anything...
It may have been trollish, but that wasn't my intention. He's complaining about a speed metric impacting his ranking, so I didn't consider VDSL.
Don't worry, if you hosted it on your own DSL line and it worked, the traffic was so low that nobody went to it anyways. Or you could read the part where it says the less than 1% of searches are being impacted.
The quoted second definition still doesn't apply and neither does the first:
a sales tactic in which a customer is attracted by the advertisement of a low-priced item but is then encouraged to buy a higher-priced one
This one was one the times that wiki was right, chill.
Have you?
But it's a single form factor and a single purchase using PS3 for both.