I'm not really questioning the results but he methodology. If your gonna state things as facts give supporting data.
As to my personal experience with phones I aggre the cammera quality is low, I have no issues getting images off but then, I don't live in the states and phones here are always unlocked.
And the expenses issue is a big one what carriers charge for SMS and MMS is obscene.
Show me your data the blog talks about a range of 10-50 can't get images off camera phones. First off that is a very big range. How was the data for those figures collected? Was it by measuring how many people sent pics to others using their phones with mms? If so maybe cost has something to do with it.
Any time I see statistics my eyes roll especially when the questions used to gather the data aren't included.
Base on that one blog I call shenanigans.
Slashdot Mirror
You do realise this came out of a dumbocrat controled committee not a repugant one don't ya.
I'm not really questioning the results but he methodology. If your gonna state things as facts give supporting data. As to my personal experience with phones I aggre the cammera quality is low, I have no issues getting images off but then, I don't live in the states and phones here are always unlocked. And the expenses issue is a big one what carriers charge for SMS and MMS is obscene.
Show me your data the blog talks about a range of 10-50 can't get images off camera phones. First off that is a very big range. How was the data for those figures collected? Was it by measuring how many people sent pics to others using their phones with mms? If so maybe cost has something to do with it. Any time I see statistics my eyes roll especially when the questions used to gather the data aren't included. Base on that one blog I call shenanigans.