Slashdot Mirror


User: ringokamens

ringokamens's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4

  1. Re:Is BugMeNot down? on Facebook Blocks Users From Mentioning BugMeNot.com · · Score: 1

    just keep trying, I eventually got through. Their host is awesome, I'm on the same damn host and I'm not having any problems.

  2. Re:A campaign on CallerID Spoofing to be Made Illegal · · Score: 1

    True, but you get even more privacy with a pseudonym

  3. Re:A campaign on CallerID Spoofing to be Made Illegal · · Score: 1

    No, mail fraud occurs when you use a fake name on a package to do something illegal. Unless you do something illegal (like mail a pipe bomb to somebody) then it's perfectly legal.

  4. A campaign on CallerID Spoofing to be Made Illegal · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a campaign going on at Binary Freedom right now that some of you may be interested in.
    http://binaryfreedom.info/node/163
    Basically, there are several arguments against this law

    1. It doesn't do anything
    Criminals will still make calls and spoof, so it won't stop fraud. Police can already track down spoofers with the same amount of non-spoofers who are using their phones for illegal purposes.

    2. It costs money
    We're gonna have to spend money to catch spoofers.

    3. Jurisdiction
    If the phone companies want to stop spoofing, they should design a secure system instead of relying on the congressional police

    4. Privacy
    It strips privacy that is gained by spoofing.

    5. Legitimate use
    It has legitimate uses such as for telecommuters who want the name when they make business calls to be the company's. Or how about a business that has several people using one phone line? They might want the sales associate's name to appear, which would be done through spoofing.

    Fact of the matter is, this gains us nothing. If I can write a fake name on a letter and mail it, why can't I do the same with my phone?