Pay off that panel in 2/3rds of a year assuming an average 100watt output and $0.10/KWH. Sounds a bit like saying "Let me know when doctors found a cure to cancer, then I will go see one."
Just a quick FYI, based on history, the fastest growing time in the USA for movies was when there was no copyrights.
Copyrights were enforced on the East Coast but not the the West Coast, so all of the innovators of movie making, like Fox, Metro, Goldwyn, and Mayer(MGM), and many other big names, went to the West Coast and Hollywood came from it.
I remember that one. Those "Americans" were bunking up with known terrorists that had explosives and military weapons and were already about to be bombed. The military was about to do a surgical strike on the terrorists when they found out some US citizens decided to stay over and help them with bomb making and it went all the way up to the President to find out if they should continue with their strike.
I'm sorry, but if some US citizens decided to head over to Russia during the war, I don't see why we should have stopped our attacks against a known enemy just because someone decided to defect.
If they were kidnapped, that would be one thing, but to be a traitor is entirely another. Throughout history, most countries treated traitors worse than enemies.
In the case proposed here, there is also the added need for peer review with checks and balances, not just peer review by the guy who has plenty of free time because he has nothing else going on.
The linked article is just talking about a common interface to access additional resources like CPU cores and memory via PCIe. There is no reason why you can't treat daughter-boards more like a co-CPU, like how a GPU is used to offload work.
It could be like what Seamicro does and use PCIe and a kind of "network switch", minus 10Gb NICs, cables, an actual switch, etc. Everything a bunch of nodes needs minus a lot of overhead.
A bunch of daughter-boards that plug into a PCIe motherboard is a great idea.
They've already compensated for the mass of the objects around the light. They've already calculated the amount of red-shift expected from source galaxies and have come up with values that were within 99.9% of the measured value. They are VERY confidant about light over long distance and gravity's effect on it.
The EU just want things to be fair across the board here. That simply means that Google shouldn't give their own products special treatment compared to similar products from other vendor.
I'm pretty sure that's what Google is already doing. EU wants something else.
Person 1) All is going well, notice this is part is x% slower than expected and their other part is x% faster than expected based on our last discussion
Person 2) Nothing here, all is well
Person 3) I'm stuck on this one part, this is what's going on, this is what I researched, this is how I'm thinking of attacking the problem ...Think tank mode for the group...
Ideas tossed around, move on
Most meetings around here aren't of managers, but of senior developers, architects, and engineers.Some times a manager or two will sit in and listen, but they tend not to say much, but that's more like once per month.
According to the China Daily report, the Chinese government hopes to have “40 million families connected to fiber networks by 2015,” which is almost one-third of the country’s entire population.
Average family size is a hair over 4. 40mil families is about 160mil people, or about 1/8 of their population. I could be missing something.
A few hundred years ago, people worked only a fraction as much as we work today. Because of modern technology, efficiency and productivity has gone up, yet hours worked has gone up... why is that?
The problem is unemployment is going to become more and more common as we become more efficient. Society has a whole is able to produce more than it can consume.
How will our current system handle having 99% unemployment, yet an over-abundance of supply? That is where we're heading. We need to restructure our system. Working for profit won't work in the long run, we need to work for the sake of working to better humanity. This means lots of R&D, even if "it doesn't pay off".
Too bad DDG doesn't track me like Google does. I get much better results from Google because it tracks me and integrates into gmail and G+. I don't see it as much as a privacy concern as much as I do an optimization. Data collected from tracking is highly relevant to my search results.
Are you talking about all of the unpatched VPS systems running unpatched apache and PHP software?
Pay off that panel in 2/3rds of a year assuming an average 100watt output and $0.10/KWH. Sounds a bit like saying "Let me know when doctors found a cure to cancer, then I will go see one."
What I don't understand is how my CPU can be nearly idle running a server, while the server gets slow with too many things going on at once.
If a CPU is idle, the server should not be getting bogged down.
3.26 KWH times 1 mil vehicles = 3.26GWH/day or enough power to run about 300,000 houses.
Funny how that adds up
That was my first impression of the phrase "turned on", in this context. I was like.. Did Cuba start "attacking" their Internet?
-40f is quite nice and converting to Centigrade is easy.
I just concert to metric, make my changes, then convert back.
Just a quick FYI, based on history, the fastest growing time in the USA for movies was when there was no copyrights.
Copyrights were enforced on the East Coast but not the the West Coast, so all of the innovators of movie making, like Fox, Metro, Goldwyn, and Mayer(MGM), and many other big names, went to the West Coast and Hollywood came from it.
Hollywood's roots are based in anti-copyright.
I'm sure they could make up something to make use of "The LAN Party"
More than 50ms is laggy.
more children are killed by [illegal] firearms each year.
Please tell me how making more laws will stop illegal firearms.
I remember that one. Those "Americans" were bunking up with known terrorists that had explosives and military weapons and were already about to be bombed. The military was about to do a surgical strike on the terrorists when they found out some US citizens decided to stay over and help them with bomb making and it went all the way up to the President to find out if they should continue with their strike.
I'm sorry, but if some US citizens decided to head over to Russia during the war, I don't see why we should have stopped our attacks against a known enemy just because someone decided to defect.
If they were kidnapped, that would be one thing, but to be a traitor is entirely another. Throughout history, most countries treated traitors worse than enemies.
Also christians have a long history of killing people.
I like to consider myself a real Christian, so I know just how judgmental many of these fake Christians can be.
In the case proposed here, there is also the added need for peer review with checks and balances, not just peer review by the guy who has plenty of free time because he has nothing else going on.
That could be handled by a system similar to the Web of Trust http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_trust
The linked article is just talking about a common interface to access additional resources like CPU cores and memory via PCIe. There is no reason why you can't treat daughter-boards more like a co-CPU, like how a GPU is used to offload work.
It could be like what Seamicro does and use PCIe and a kind of "network switch", minus 10Gb NICs, cables, an actual switch, etc. Everything a bunch of nodes needs minus a lot of overhead.
A bunch of daughter-boards that plug into a PCIe motherboard is a great idea.
They've already compensated for the mass of the objects around the light. They've already calculated the amount of red-shift expected from source galaxies and have come up with values that were within 99.9% of the measured value. They are VERY confidant about light over long distance and gravity's effect on it.
The EU just want things to be fair across the board here. That simply means that Google shouldn't give their own products special treatment compared to similar products from other vendor.
I'm pretty sure that's what Google is already doing. EU wants something else.
That's not how our meetings go.. more like
...Think tank mode for the group...
Person 1) All is going well, notice this is part is x% slower than expected and their other part is x% faster than expected based on our last discussion
Person 2) Nothing here, all is well
Person 3) I'm stuck on this one part, this is what's going on, this is what I researched, this is how I'm thinking of attacking the problem
Ideas tossed around, move on
Most meetings around here aren't of managers, but of senior developers, architects, and engineers.Some times a manager or two will sit in and listen, but they tend not to say much, but that's more like once per month.
According to the China Daily report, the Chinese government hopes to have “40 million families connected to fiber networks by 2015,” which is almost one-third of the country’s entire population.
Average family size is a hair over 4. 40mil families is about 160mil people, or about 1/8 of their population. I could be missing something.
I have the same feeling about computers. Why can't technology just stop getting better? Why do people always have to improve things?!
I have to agree. I let Chrome run for weeks at a time on both my work and home machine. But let FireFox run for 2-3 days and I have no memory left.
A few hundred years ago, people worked only a fraction as much as we work today. Because of modern technology, efficiency and productivity has gone up, yet hours worked has gone up... why is that?
The problem is unemployment is going to become more and more common as we become more efficient. Society has a whole is able to produce more than it can consume.
How will our current system handle having 99% unemployment, yet an over-abundance of supply? That is where we're heading. We need to restructure our system. Working for profit won't work in the long run, we need to work for the sake of working to better humanity. This means lots of R&D, even if "it doesn't pay off".
Too bad DDG doesn't track me like Google does. I get much better results from Google because it tracks me and integrates into gmail and G+. I don't see it as much as a privacy concern as much as I do an optimization. Data collected from tracking is highly relevant to my search results.
I'm assuming you're talking about stuff like data-locality, which a compiler can't make work correctly without understanding the design of the system.