Slashdot Mirror


User: nanomech

nanomech's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5

  1. Re:Great advance but no panacea on Lucent Makes 10 Terabit Router · · Score: 1

    This puppy will do oc192.

  2. Re:Never Relent, DOJ! on Microsoft == Monopoly says Judge · · Score: 1

    I agree. They should just skip all of the appelate crap and get the final descision.

  3. Re:IN DEFENSE OF MICROSOFT on Microsoft == Monopoly says Judge · · Score: 1

    What a crock of spin.

  4. What's up with this excerpt about Intel? on Microsoft == Monopoly says Judge · · Score: 1

    I haven't read the whole FOF, but from paragraph 95 of Section V: "Intel's software development efforts, which take place at the Intel Architecture Labs ("IAL"), are directed primarily at finding useful ways to consume more microprocessor cycles, thereby stimulating demand for advanced Intel microprocessors." Not to divert any attention from the M$ scumsuckers, but this little tidbit kind of jumped out at me about Intel. I wonder how much of this M$ has taken upon itself to perform for Intel with their subsequent underhanded dealings. I wonder this because I recently put Outlook Express 5 on my win95 box and everything slowed to a crawl. The system would often ignore mouse clicks and keyboard input for more than a minute before responding. That box is an AMD K6-III/400, BTW, with 1MB of L3 cache, 128MB SDRAM, 100MHz front side bus, and hardly the whimpy system that OE5 made it into. I uninstalled OE5 and left IE5 and the responsiveness came back. I'm also not trying to feed any conspiracy theories or anything. But it really makes me wonder, and enough to wonder out loud here.

  5. Re:WordPerfect format on Slashdot's "Instant" Legal Analysis of the MS Ruling · · Score: 1

    Why, this is not b-l-o-a-t, it is Microsoft i-n-n-o-v-a-t-i-o-n.