Slashdot Mirror


User: EvilTwinSkippy

EvilTwinSkippy's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,256
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,256

  1. Re:Construction materials on Texas Scientists Spin Carbon Nanotube Fiber · · Score: 2, Informative
    Not just fabric. I've seen a screwdrive poke through naked carbon-fiber meshes. You actually need to bond several layers together at differenent angles for it to be effective. Unfortunately it has a tendency to delaminate (peel apart) as it fatigues.

    A random noodle arrangement like you see in fiberglass might work, but you loose a lot of your flexibility.

  2. Re:Bullet proof? on Texas Scientists Spin Carbon Nanotube Fiber · · Score: 1

    Not really. It's only strong in one direction, and even then, only in tension. It would make a great cable though.

  3. Re:Construction materials on Texas Scientists Spin Carbon Nanotube Fiber · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately it's only strong in tension. If you have ever worked with carbon fiber, it's REALLY easy to cut, sideways. Think of it like a really strong, really thin nylon string.

  4. Re:A Miracle for Population Control? on Texas Scientists Spin Carbon Nanotube Fiber · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't know if you have ever worked with carbon fiber. Having worked with composite shells on solar cars, it's as bad a fiberglass.

    And if you think Mr. Willy is going to be sore, just imagine what the Mrs.'s naughty bits are going to be subjected to.

  5. Re:Goal is to Maintain the Unix Standard on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1
    I do hear you in that. You see it all the time in chemistry. Acetylsalicylic acid, with the proper labeling, is Aspirin. Aspartame is a nameless chemical without the cute little swirl of the Nutra-Sweet logo. Once the patents expire, anyone is free to make something the looks and tastes the same, they just can't use the brand name.

    We really do need to seperate our work from the companies that package it. Partly for their protection, but mostly for ours. There is no telling when some company is going to do something majorly bone-headed a decade down the road that disparages a name.

    As is stands, I think that BSD and GNU/*Linux(R) stand on their own. Any references to *nix are strictly historical. Indeed the reference cause more issues than it opens doors. Most of my clients are content to know their software runs under Linux. They don't know of care what *Unix(R) is or was.

    * Unix is a Registered Trademark of the Open Group
    * Linux is a Registered Trademark of Linux Torvalds

  6. Re:unix is generic! on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1
    Apple has a rock solid case, the Opengroup can go Unix themselves

    No no, your phrasing is off. I believe you meant that you hope that the OpenGroup can go become Unix themselves. And, really, I think SCO should too.

    I'm not so unix about that. The orignal unix was in the present unix tense. To conjucate:

    I unix, you unix, he/she/it unix, I am unixing, he/she/it are unixing, they unixed, hey baby lets unix, and unix off. Somewhere in RFC23452 though, a subclause says to throw all unix to the wind, and simply conjugate it anyway that seems esthetic. There is a unix as to whether that was negated by a later RFC or not, but google hasn't indexed the site since the unix webmaster put that section in the robots.txt file.

  7. Re:God sued? on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    You see a lot of Bhuddist monks in orange robes. But that would be comparing apples to oranges, wouldn't it?

  8. Re:so if you didn't use Unix... what would you say on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    And if they sued us on sound, we'd call is Castrotti. After what could be construed as a sexist remark, I'd rather leave this thread on a high note.

  9. Re:OPEN Group? on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    I hearby announce the creation of the Foo group. If you have to ask what we do, you will never understand. That and we will sneer at you.

  10. Re:so if you didn't use Unix... what would you say on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    We would say Eunichs of course. Though, we would have a hell of a time explaining how we get such high performance out of a machine with no balls.

  11. Re:You just have to laugh on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    I'll have you know that even a wall of solid lead is mostly made of empty, er open space.

  12. Re:You just have to laugh on Apple Sued Over Unix Trademark · · Score: 1

    Wait! They didn't say if Bill is actually Linus' long lost twin brother from when Ken and Ma Bell got it on after falling under the spell of an evil wizard during Richard Stallman's flashback sequence!

  13. Re:Why is Linux so metaphorical? on Did SCO 'Borrow' Linux Code? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Frankly a zealot is a zealot, regardless of the cause. You have people who kill abortion doctors (um, er, isn't that tecnically an abortion in the 120th trimester?). You have the folks who are trying to hijack Islam with their Jihads. Hell, even with political parties, you have folks advocating violence against the other side.

    I don't think Linux has any more or less zealots per capita than any other organization. But remember, we are talking about millions of people in hundreds of countries. Your probability of running into at least a few crackpots approaches 1.

    Personally, I love Linux, and I live the methodologies of Open Source in my own career. I do not insist that the entire world use Linux, nor do I feel threatened by any of this legal crap. Even if they find some snibble patent and confiscate the entire source tree (that will never happen by the way) Alan, Linus, and company would simply start over and program Linux2. And I'd be first in line to help.

  14. Re:Antitrust on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1

    Why do I have this nagging feeling that Palladium really should have been called the "Anti-Trusted Computing Initiative."

  15. Re:Why am I reminded of a Queen song? on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    I'm thinking of the Byrds personally:

    How can you tell me,
    over and over again,
    you don't believe,
    we are on the eve of destruction?

  16. Re:ClamAV! ClamAV! ClamAV! on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    I've been useing a simple Razor to scan email: if it's executable it's returned to sender. All HTML code is obfuscated with Mime-Defang.

    I'm going to start cracking down on MS attachments, and insist people transmit stuff over the network in PDF form. This, of course, does not work for a document in revision.

    How good a job does it do with Macro viruses?

  17. Re:Has nobody thought about Hotmail/MSN? on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the migration from BSD to 2000 isn't going as smoothly for the Hotmail servers as we were led to believe.

    LOL

  18. Re:Mr. Balmer... on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    So does this mean that you're standing down from your goal of "Secure Computing" to something more akin to "Kinda Almost OurFingersAreCrossed WeKnowMoreThanTheHackers WeAllCarryRabbitsFeet Computing"?

    And to think I once believed in you guys.

    Hey, Palladium is a reference to an image made by Athena of her playmate "Pallus". It was supposed to protect Troy from invasion, but was stolen.

    Oh, and look at the new OS names coming down the pike: Longhorn, Blackcomb... They are all breeds of Cattle.

    I think someone is having too much fun with names.

  19. Re:The obligatory Simpsons quote... on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    So does that make rich people maniacially jealous, or are they as insanely jealous as the rest of us.

    No wait, short of someone else girl, they can buy whatever it is. Must not come up very often.

  20. RE: Cross platform on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    I believe Microsoft will follow RAV's cross platform tradition. The products will be available on all major platforms including Windows 9X, Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003 and Windows CE.

    What about Bob?

  21. Re:Or... on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    And that includes making anti-slashdot posts anonymously?

    No, Anti-Slashdot posts are "credibility" builders. Anonymous Posts are reserved for character attacks or snide comments of a personal nature.

  22. Re:Talk about yer conflict of interest. on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1

    That's like a character saying "It can't get any worse than this, can..." followed by an explosion, a plot complication, or the onset of a typhoon.

  23. Bungie on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    Bungie developed one of the first Doom-A-Like's for the Macintosh, Marathon. It had a really cool network multiplayer mode, back before this stuff was cool.

    They eventually spread into the Windows and Linux world's. They had been working on a game "Halo" that looked like it was going to be really neat, and run on several platforms.

    Microsoft bought them, and made Halo and X-Box only title.

  24. Re:not a history noo... on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    It was a funny post my friend.

    What is worse is Microsoft's habit of stabbing in the back anyone who actually WAS working for them. AutoDesk is still pissed they hobbled Java, they had written an entire high-end CAD package around it.

  25. Re:It's VIRUSES. on Microsoft Acquires RAV Antivirus · · Score: 1
    It's not the "Add random letters for no reason" rule. It the "I want to sound like I know latin" rule.

    Next you will be telling me that tech columnists actually have a clue on how to pronounce Linux. Every one of them has a different way of saying it, every one of them insists they have the correct one, and none of them sound like Linus' definative LEE-NOOCKS