I've been using chrome for a day now, and I must say I'm very impressed, particularly with the ability to see the resource usage. This was immediately useful for me, as cpu-hogging flash applets have always been a pain to find and kill.
The one thing that's bugging me is that the rendering speed seems too be quite a bit worse than FF3. I can see this on sites like espn.com with their drop-down menus -- the menu item highlighting lags a little bit behind the mouse. It's kind of annoying, especially under heavy cpu load or laptop cpu-throttling mode. Has anyone else seen this?
The javascript performance appears to be great, but blasting bitmaps to the screen quickly is important, too.
Slashdot Mirror
I've been using chrome for a day now, and I must say I'm very impressed, particularly with the ability to see the resource usage. This was immediately useful for me, as cpu-hogging flash applets have always been a pain to find and kill.
The one thing that's bugging me is that the rendering speed seems too be quite a bit worse than FF3. I can see this on sites like espn.com with their drop-down menus -- the menu item highlighting lags a little bit behind the mouse. It's kind of annoying, especially under heavy cpu load or laptop cpu-throttling mode. Has anyone else seen this?
The javascript performance appears to be great, but blasting bitmaps to the screen quickly is important, too.