Slashdot Mirror


User: Blissyu2

Blissyu2's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
9
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 9

  1. Virgil Griffith and Wikipedia on See Who Is Whitewashing Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    At the top of the wired blog comments right now is this one: Wikimedia Foundation employee removes source about Wiki Scanner funding by Anonymous Vishal-WMF, an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation, has removed evidence from a news story that uncovered that Virgil, the scanner's creator, was HIRED by the Wikimedia Foundation! News story that was removed by Wikipedia Employee (not admin, EMPLOYEE): http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_vi ew.asp?at_code=428814 Backup archive link in case the WMF 'vanishes' the evidence: http://www.webcitation.org/5RAEP2kAl Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Virgil_G riffith&diff=prev&oldid=151814656 Yet Wired has claimed that this is a "false claim": "Update: 8/17/2007 A Wikimedia Foundation employee really did edit Virgil Griffith's entry today, but only to cut a false claim that Griffith was employed by the foundation to create the scanner. " So what makes Wired assume that it is a false claim? This is the same guy that brought us Wikipedia and the Intelligence Services, and he is stating something as fact, not as an opinion. "On July 26, OhmyNews alleged that Wikipedia may have been infiltrated by Intelligence Agencies. The story attracted more than 50,000 readers in just three days, was highly debated on the Web, and translated in several languages. Wikipedia quickly reacted to the news and hired Virgil Griffith, one of the best known American hacker, to investigate the matter." Yet Wikipedia claims its "unreliable". Wikipedia has used ohmynews as a source in 192 of their articles: and has been used in Google news 460 times: http://news.google.com.au/news?hl=en&ned=au&q=ohmy news&btnG=Search+News Virgil Griffith does claim that he wasn't paid by Wikipedia: http://virgil.gr/31.html and the Wikipedia staff went so far as to remove the links, and then ban the IP address of the person who had inserted them: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special: Log&type=block&page=User:123.2.168.215 Daniel Brandt claims that it is far too expensive for him to have done it himself: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic= 11853&view=findpost&p=43697 But perhaps he really did do all of this just to make himself popular. Spend a few thousand dollars, including the $349 to do the reverse IP lookups: http://www.ip2location.com/ip-country-region-city- isp.aspx , saved presumably through his time as an unemployed student and spent several hundred hours creating something that does nothing more than make him well-known. Perhaps it'll help him to get a job sometime in the future? And perhaps its all one almighty coincidence that all this has happened just a week after Wikipedia was reeling after the massive censorship about the SlimVirgin scandal. Oh, and also note that another IP that reverted edits to the article belonged to Jayjg, the person most closely related to SlimVirgin: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic= 11853&view=findpost&p=43641 Coincidence, coincidence, coincidence. And this over an issue in which we've proven that the CIA edits Wikipedia with a definite aim, as have many other industr

  2. For comprehensive coverage of this scandal: on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    Wikipedia Review has compiled a comprehensive research in to issues related to this scandal: http://wikipediareview.com/blog/20070802/comprehen sive-coverage-of-the-slimvirgin-scandal/

  3. Re:A Wikipedia sysop breaks this down on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your denials are pointless now that this story has been proven to be true, and Jimbo has announced a confession that the edits were oversighted: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007 -July/078336.html Please cease this foolish denial. Denying something when you have plausible deniability is one thing. But you no longer have plausible deniability at all. This story is true. Even Jimbo admits that it is based in truth.

  4. Re:A Wikipedia sysop breaks this down on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    But that's simply not true. Jimbo has admitted that the edits were oversighted, so your denial of it, after it is proven and admitted just makes you look stupid. http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007 -July/078336.html

  5. Re:SlimVirgin seems to always get out of things... on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    There's always been something very suspicious that SlimVirgin gets away with a lot more than other people do.

  6. Re:Jimbo admits that the edits were oversighted on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    Don't tell me I forgot the link to Jimbo's confession: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007 -July/078336.html If its possible, could someone move that up in to my post above? Thanks.

  7. Jimbo admits that the edits were oversighted on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    This is now being discussed openly (ish) on the Wikipedia mailing list. After an investigation uncovered that some of SlimVirgin's edits to Pan Am 103 had been oversighted: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007 -July/078241.html and that there was a Wikipedia Review topic that thoroughly investigated the oversighting at the time: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007 -July/078266.html http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=186 4&hl= http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=113 5&hl= Wikipedia has been forced to admit fault here (after dozens of deleted edits from Crum375, ElinorD, Jayjg and SlimVirgin, including many blocks to people who linked to Slashdot). They have now added it to the Wikipedia Signpost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_S ignpost/2007-07-30/In_the_news The speculation about whether this issue is true or not should end now. It is true, confirmed by Jimbo himself. The only question now is what we should do about it.

  8. Re:Shameful this made it to the front page on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 1

    Coming from one of the worst stalkers on Wikipedia, I don't know how much merit you really have. Aren't you one of the people that does SlimVirgin's bidding? Come off it, you are a troll, and how can anyone take you seriously?

  9. Whoever could have imagined? on Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents? · · Score: 2, Informative

    What do you guys think that the CIA and MI5 and other secret agencies around the world are charged to do? Yes, they do exist, and yes they are supposed to do things. They gather intelligence, whilst at the same time trying to stop other agents around the world, and the general public, from finding out the truth. Of course they are involved in Wikipedia. Anyone who thought that they weren't is somewhat naive. And a lot of them are pretty obvious too. SlimVirgin regularly deletes comments unread from her user talk page, as well as article pages, is constantly deleting "offensive" material from articles all over Wikipedia, is forever complaining about people for "indulging in Wikistalking" or anything related to finding out what is really going on, then makes vague references to it without any real proof. She is the reason that the Oversight command was created. Her edits to Lockerbie bombing and to Salinger's articles (her first ever edits on Wikipedia) were some of the first ever uses of the Oversight command - to hide her identity (luckily a few people like myself had saved these edits before she did this). What more has she done? It shouldn't come as any surprise whatsoever that SlimVirgin is a secret agent. She acts in the exact way that a secret agent should operate. And either Jimbo is very naive, or else he is willing to do his bit for his country. Perhaps indeed, SlimVirgin is a member of MIB. "We are the best kept secret in the galaxy. We monitor, licence and police all alien activity on the Earth. We're your first, last, and only line of defense. We live in secret, we exsist in shadow. And we dress in black." [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119654/quotes]