The issue here is that that warrants must state exactly what and where they are looking, and this warrant covered records for 10 specific people. They then "saw" information about other people not included in the warrant.
Most warrants are no doubt much less specific, and they would have gotten away with this.
Slashdot Mirror
The issue here is that that warrants must state exactly what and where they are looking, and this warrant covered records for 10 specific people. They then "saw" information about other people not included in the warrant. Most warrants are no doubt much less specific, and they would have gotten away with this.