Anyone who uses a GPL'd sourcecode to derive own code-work automatically agrees to the provisions of the whole GPL agreement of releasing all source-codes derived. Period. You want to close your source-code, then don't use a GPL'd source-code to make your shit. It's as simple as that. Does Slade really want to see lawyers? Does Slade want the other GPL-"enforcers"? --treatment--
>We must face facts, Bruce: the GPL is an >instrument of spite designed to hurt people. >Honest people who want to make an honest living. >It is therefore unethical to use or support it.
__Who__ are these honest people that you are talking about? Be specific.
How is it really _unethical_ to use or support GPL? Do you write software? If so, for _whom_? Do _you_ own that software you wrote? If not, then _why the heck not_?
__Nobody__ is forcing people like _YOU_ to use the GPL. If you don't want it, don't use it. Don't _whine_ about what other people prefer to use. The GPL is very simple: either you agree to use it, or you don't use it coz you don't agree to it. Don't try to pontificate about your jihad against RMS or the GPL.
How about __YOU__ come up with a better license than GPL and tell us exactly how many coders are willing to accept __your Brett Glass license__. Don't even think about appropriating or cloning the various *bsd-type licensing terms.
>LinuxOne's fake distro was exposed a >LLLLOOOOONNGGG time ago. You may be an old-timer >on LinuxNewbie, but you clearly have not been >reading Slashdot. Want to see what'll show up as >the next LinuxNewbie expose'? Get a little taste >of the future! Come read this! hee hee
You're such a doofus. Nobody has done any review of the actual LinuxOne distro besides LNO since it was only released some weeks ago and LNO's member got a hold of it right out of the ftp-bat and sent in the first review here at slashdot and everywhere else! Next time you try to divert attention, check you story correctly.
Fyi, I'm an old-timer here in slashdot and the whole linux-advocacy, not just at LNO.
What? You work with MattMann, too? Maybe you're the same person as MattMann.
>Hypocrite, your email address is not in your info
DUHH!! Did you actually read that Mattman's sliming LinuxNewbie.org and did you actually went there? You that blind you can't read Sensei's email-address from that site that he owns? DUHH!
>You say that what he has posted is FUD even >though he has given many reasons to back up his > argument, while you have given none
You got a really bad case of reading-disability, huh? MattMann's just trolled and tried to slime a good newbie-site. Why? Coz Linuxnewbie did a great job of exposing LinuxOne's fake-distro. That pissed off MattMann in another thread and then he goes here at this thread to try to confused people about Linuxnewbie-site, probably hoping that people will not read the first-hand linuxone-distro review over there.
>I agree with him completely
You oughta. You seem to be either himself or another person working for/with him.
If you're gonna troll, troll better. Go pack your bowling bags and read trolling-101 book.
MattMan, It's clueless snotty zealots like you that makes non-linux users wonder about the mentality of all the linux-users. You're just a 14-year-old mama's boy. You're probably another disgruntled team-os/2 member that jumped to the linux-bandwagon just so you can label sites and people as Bill Gates' minions. You clearly have __NO IDEA__ how linuxnewbie.org helps newbies. If you're that smart and not just another armchair-critic, why don't YOU build a linux-newbie site of your own? Heck! I'll wager that __YOU__ have not contributed at all in helping out newbies __anywhere__ at any __time__ since Linux broke out. If you have a problem with the LNO site or any articles posted there, then go post at the friggin LNO-forum about it. Email the authors or the site-owners, instead of assasinating a good site's rep over here at slashdot. Instead of just __WHINING__ about your dis-agreement with a particular article, why don't __YOU__ write another Samba-article for all the world to read? You can't coz you're __not qualified__ to do so. Get off your high horse and start contributing __POSITIVELY and ACTIVELY__ to the linux movement. It doesn't matter where, just friggin do it. --xre--
Courtesy of and from www.attrition.org, decide for yourself if this image-pic is anyway bad. http://www.attrition.org/negation/image/vran.jpg These are the other images in there: http://www.attrition.org/negation/image Contact http://www.attrition.org for more info since they had this images way before PacketStorm.
Courtesy of and from www.attrition.org, decide for yourself if this image-pic is anyway bad. www.attrition.org/negation/image/vran.jpg These are the other images in there: www.attrition.org/negation/image Contact www.attrition.org for more info since they had this images way before PacketStorm.
Slashdot Mirror
Anyone who uses a GPL'd sourcecode to derive own code-work automatically agrees to the provisions of the whole GPL agreement of releasing all source-codes derived. Period.
You want to close your source-code, then don't use a GPL'd source-code to make your shit.
It's as simple as that.
Does Slade really want to see lawyers? Does Slade want the other GPL-"enforcers"?
--treatment--
>We must face facts, Bruce: the GPL is an
>instrument of spite designed to hurt people.
>Honest people who want to make an honest living.
>It is therefore unethical to use or support it.
__Who__ are these honest people that you are talking about? Be specific.
How is it really _unethical_ to use or support GPL? Do you write software? If so, for _whom_? Do _you_ own that software you wrote? If not, then _why the heck not_?
__Nobody__ is forcing people like _YOU_ to use the GPL. If you don't want it, don't use it. Don't _whine_ about what other people prefer to use. The GPL is very simple: either you agree to use it, or you don't use it coz you don't agree to it. Don't try to pontificate about your jihad against RMS or the GPL.
How about __YOU__ come up with a better license than GPL and tell us exactly how many coders are willing to accept __your Brett Glass license__. Don't even think about appropriating or cloning the various *bsd-type licensing terms.
--treatment--
>LinuxOne's fake distro was exposed a
>LLLLOOOOONNGGG time ago. You may be an old-timer
>on LinuxNewbie, but you clearly have not been
>reading Slashdot. Want to see what'll show up as
>the next LinuxNewbie expose'? Get a little taste
>of the future! Come read this! hee hee
You're such a doofus. Nobody has done any review of the actual LinuxOne distro besides LNO since it was only released some weeks ago and LNO's member got a hold of it right out of the ftp-bat and sent in the first review here at slashdot and everywhere else! Next time you try to divert attention, check you story correctly.
Fyi, I'm an old-timer here in slashdot and the whole linux-advocacy, not just at LNO.
--xre--
What? You work with MattMann, too? Maybe you're the same person as MattMann.
>Hypocrite, your email address is not in your info
DUHH!! Did you actually read that Mattman's sliming LinuxNewbie.org and did you actually went there? You that blind you can't read Sensei's email-address from that site that he owns? DUHH!
>You say that what he has posted is FUD even
>though he has given many reasons to back up his
> argument, while you have given none
You got a really bad case of reading-disability, huh? MattMann's just trolled and tried to slime a good newbie-site. Why? Coz Linuxnewbie did a great job of exposing LinuxOne's fake-distro. That pissed off MattMann in another thread and then he goes here at this thread to try to confused people about Linuxnewbie-site, probably hoping that people will not read the first-hand linuxone-distro review over there.
>I agree with him completely
You oughta. You seem to be either himself or another person working for/with him.
If you're gonna troll, troll better. Go pack your bowling bags and read trolling-101 book.
--treatment--
So you work for LinuxOne, huh? Figures... --xre--
So you work for LinuxOne, huh? figures. --xre--
MattMan, It's clueless snotty zealots like you that makes non-linux users wonder about the mentality of all the linux-users. You're just a 14-year-old mama's boy. You're probably another disgruntled team-os/2 member that jumped to the linux-bandwagon just so you can label sites and people as Bill Gates' minions. You clearly have __NO IDEA__ how linuxnewbie.org helps newbies. If you're that smart and not just another armchair-critic, why don't YOU build a linux-newbie site of your own? Heck! I'll wager that __YOU__ have not contributed at all in helping out newbies __anywhere__ at any __time__ since Linux broke out. If you have a problem with the LNO site or any articles posted there, then go post at the friggin LNO-forum about it. Email the authors or the site-owners, instead of assasinating a good site's rep over here at slashdot. Instead of just __WHINING__ about your dis-agreement with a particular article, why don't __YOU__ write another Samba-article for all the world to read? You can't coz you're __not qualified__ to do so. Get off your high horse and start contributing __POSITIVELY and ACTIVELY__ to the linux movement. It doesn't matter where, just friggin do it. --xre--
Courtesy of and from www.attrition.org, decide for yourself if this image-pic is anyway bad. http://www.attrition.org/negation/image/vran.jpg These are the other images in there: http://www.attrition.org/negation/image Contact http://www.attrition.org for more info since they had this images way before PacketStorm.
Courtesy of and from www.attrition.org, decide for yourself if this image-pic is anyway bad. www.attrition.org/negation/image/vran.jpg These are the other images in there: www.attrition.org/negation/image Contact www.attrition.org for more info since they had this images way before PacketStorm.