So, what? If I feel that capitalism allowed to be unrestrained by a hampered limited government is bad news, then I have clearly been tainted by university professors? Whatever. I'll just pass on reading your blog and instead ask the moderators why the Hell this article was accepted at all (let alone promoted to front page material).
Please, enlighten us as to how that is relevant to the article and that it is actual fact. Are you more atwitter about it coming from an "Evil Right Wingers" weblog? Would it have been more credible from some Left Wing site? Like that would happen.
But I digress, let's hear your take on this dumbass politically corrected GI Joe debacle of a feater, and I use that term loosely, motion picture?
As for the moderators, regardless of their political leanings, maybe they don't have as big a problem with respecting other peoples opinions on current events as you. Or, you could use some common sense and figure that they checked on the information and found it true. Do you have a problem with the truth when it may not serve your political stance? I know I don't, for example, Bush has made a complete mess of his presidency. One way is that he positioned himself far left of JFK. Another is not setting a policy and sticking to it. That's where Kennedy, Reagen and other great pesidents kicked ass.
I seem to remember reading the exact same kind of bullcrap from AOL when people complained about how their software, and I use that term loosely, drags even the most stout PC to it's knees. Some AOL apologist/spokes mouth/Tech Support weeny showed up on a forum I was participating in and said that the software is so advanced and powerful it consumes 90 or so percent of system resources. Needless to say, that went over like a lead balloon. Of course, when confronted about why a file system gets corrupted without fail whenever someone uninstalls this crap made them go away and never return. How odd.
Now we have Micro$oft pulling the same crap. Does it ever end?
Slashdot Mirror
Please, enlighten us as to how that is relevant to the article and that it is actual fact. Are you more atwitter about it coming from an "Evil Right Wingers" weblog? Would it have been more credible from some Left Wing site? Like that would happen.
But I digress, let's hear your take on this dumbass politically corrected GI Joe debacle of a feater, and I use that term loosely, motion picture?
As for the moderators, regardless of their political leanings, maybe they don't have as big a problem with respecting other peoples opinions on current events as you. Or, you could use some common sense and figure that they checked on the information and found it true. Do you have a problem with the truth when it may not serve your political stance? I know I don't, for example, Bush has made a complete mess of his presidency. One way is that he positioned himself far left of JFK. Another is not setting a policy and sticking to it. That's where Kennedy, Reagen and other great pesidents kicked ass.
Now we have Micro$oft pulling the same crap. Does it ever end?