I don't understand this sentence :
"Keeping their links full may ensure that content providers must pay to colocate within Comcast's network"
I don't know how Comcast's service works
But you use terms made for finite concepts : "one thing minus the same thing is zero".
For example, if you subtract an infinite number of elements to set with infinite elements , how much elements are there ? Zero ?
No; there are an infinite number of elements
9.999... -- 0.999... = 9 ? why ?
If I suppose than 9.999... -- 0.999... limits on 9 because the operation consists of a infinite number of finite operations .
In this case ,
0.99999 limits on 1 , and this has sense
I don't understand this sentence : "Keeping their links full may ensure that content providers must pay to colocate within Comcast's network" I don't know how Comcast's service works
Yes, I agree with you : it's possible to be . I thought that could be a transistor radio, but was developed in 1954 ( Wikipedia dixit )
IBM join to OpenJDK, Oracle merges JVMs ...
If Apple deprecated its JVM, this can be the end of years of confusion about which JVM to use.
But you use terms made for finite concepts : "one thing minus the same thing is zero". For example, if you subtract an infinite number of elements to set with infinite elements , how much elements are there ? Zero ? No; there are an infinite number of elements
Human stupidity = infinity This axiom explains everything :-)
9.999... -- 0.999... = 9 ? why ? If I suppose than 9.999... -- 0.999... limits on 9 because the operation consists of a infinite number of finite operations . In this case , 0.99999 limits on 1 , and this has sense
"The Eight" novel , by Katherine Neville, told about this question :-)
Futile. Another question.
Maivi