So they put stuff on their web site, and get angry when people actually read it... Their *WEB SITE* for chrissakes!
As copyright lawyers I can accept it is difficult for them to understand that "telnet" is a valid web-browser, even if tables don't render quite as nifty as with Firefox (gee, they may not even have *heard* about telnet). But I would at least have expected the term "public domain" to ring a bell.
If they're so desperate, why don't they just send spam-mails with their content and then sue the whole world?
So they put stuff on their web site, and get angry when people actually read it... Their *WEB SITE* for chrissakes!
As copyright lawyers I can accept it is difficult for them to understand that "telnet" is a valid web-browser, even if tables don't render quite as nifty as with Firefox (gee, they may not even have *heard* about telnet). But I would at least have expected the term "public domain" to ring a bell.
If they're so desperate, why don't they just send spam-mails with their content and then sue the whole world?
- compare "Google Maps API" with "Microsoft Maps API",
- or compare "Google Maps" with "Microsoft Maps".
In both cases, Google Maps wins.