Why are you on this site? Vista really does suck major balls. And if you want to play "video games in DirectX" then you should be using XP. A large number of games for Windows RUN BETTER IN LINUX THAN IN VISTA!!! That's because of all the memory and cycles that are wasted by that piece of crap on line after bloated line of legacy code, a pig GUI that can't compare in looks or speed or customizability (or... got any other categories for Vista's visual interface to be beaten in?) to Beryl, and 'security features' that are a joke.
Well, you paid for it, might as well enjoy it. Or, on second thought, grow a brain, use it, recognize your Vista purchase is a sunk cost better not spoken of or dwelt on, download an Ubuntu Feisty Fawn.iso, burn it, boot it, install it, and get Beryl. Now you can have true elegance, speed, customizability, and looks in an operating system -- AND IT'S NOT A PIECEOF BLOATWARE, PIG-LIKE JUNK!
Then find new ways to define eras of your life other than your OS. Linux is cool and all, but you got to have a life. (And, if you're trying to be a nerd, don't be a malformed one. At least be able to evaluate an operating system. Seriously. This is one of those times when if you aim for the stars you damn well better make it cause landing somewhere else in the cosmos is going to be mean being some pathetic half-breed. Like a geek who praises Vista.)
In case you didn't notice the line: THE CONSERVATIVES MADE MORE MISTAKES!
The conservatives WERE WRONG!
There's no two ways about this: the LIBERALS RESPONDED TO THE TASK AT HAND **CORRECTLY** WHILE THE CONSERVATIVES FAILED!
Nobody is 'susceptible' to liberalism because of age -- and you're only susceptible to conservatism IF YOUR BRAIN STOPS BEING ABLE TO RECOGNIZE THE REALITIES IT IS PRESENTED WITH FOR WHAT THEY ARE and / or YOU BEING TO RESPOND INCORRECTLY.
(Now, conservative and liberal are in need of defining in any discussion of the two. But, in general, we know what we're talking about here, and given those common-understanding definitions, what I wrote is true. And now we have the science to back it up. Bush is an idiot monkey sitting there banging on a keyboard while he's looking at a losing war, even though he was instructors [logic] to take a new tact. This is because, just like the subjects in the study, the Conservatives are UNABLE TO FOLLOW DIRECTIONS AND RESPOND ACCORDING TO THEM.)
Who said you can't use Wiki on a college paper -- at any college? How would you know something that would require input from people from such a broad swath of colleges?
What's that you say? You consulted a wiki...
Slashdot Mirror
Why are you on this site? Vista really does suck major balls. And if you want to play "video games in DirectX" then you should be using XP. A large number of games for Windows RUN BETTER IN LINUX THAN IN VISTA!!! That's because of all the memory and cycles that are wasted by that piece of crap on line after bloated line of legacy code, a pig GUI that can't compare in looks or speed or customizability (or... got any other categories for Vista's visual interface to be beaten in?) to Beryl, and 'security features' that are a joke. Well, you paid for it, might as well enjoy it. Or, on second thought, grow a brain, use it, recognize your Vista purchase is a sunk cost better not spoken of or dwelt on, download an Ubuntu Feisty Fawn .iso, burn it, boot it, install it, and get Beryl. Now you can have true elegance, speed, customizability, and looks in an operating system -- AND IT'S NOT A PIECEOF BLOATWARE, PIG-LIKE JUNK!
Then find new ways to define eras of your life other than your OS. Linux is cool and all, but you got to have a life. (And, if you're trying to be a nerd, don't be a malformed one. At least be able to evaluate an operating system. Seriously. This is one of those times when if you aim for the stars you damn well better make it cause landing somewhere else in the cosmos is going to be mean being some pathetic half-breed. Like a geek who praises Vista.)
Marzen, tu es muy tonto. Estoopito. Long o.
In case you didn't notice the line: THE CONSERVATIVES MADE MORE MISTAKES! The conservatives WERE WRONG! There's no two ways about this: the LIBERALS RESPONDED TO THE TASK AT HAND **CORRECTLY** WHILE THE CONSERVATIVES FAILED! Nobody is 'susceptible' to liberalism because of age -- and you're only susceptible to conservatism IF YOUR BRAIN STOPS BEING ABLE TO RECOGNIZE THE REALITIES IT IS PRESENTED WITH FOR WHAT THEY ARE and / or YOU BEING TO RESPOND INCORRECTLY. (Now, conservative and liberal are in need of defining in any discussion of the two. But, in general, we know what we're talking about here, and given those common-understanding definitions, what I wrote is true. And now we have the science to back it up. Bush is an idiot monkey sitting there banging on a keyboard while he's looking at a losing war, even though he was instructors [logic] to take a new tact. This is because, just like the subjects in the study, the Conservatives are UNABLE TO FOLLOW DIRECTIONS AND RESPOND ACCORDING TO THEM.)
Who said you can't use Wiki on a college paper -- at any college? How would you know something that would require input from people from such a broad swath of colleges? What's that you say? You consulted a wiki...
There's a reason for only counting pages above a certain size as "articles": a heading and a sentence do not maketh a proper wikipedia article.