The only argument they have is "it's her body" and "republicans in our bedroom" and other meaningless drivel. They can't actually answer the hard questions.
I guess we draw the line at the level of complexity
I draw the line at "is anybody actually suffering ?" Well, baby itself doesn't care, and nobody else knows the baby. So, I think it's fair if we leave the decision to the mother.
A baby "doesn't care" an hour after its birth either. Are those ones still fair game?
That's why I stopped reading certain authors. Their books were "this poor guy is picked on because he's gay, and that's not fair, so let's make him the hero fighting for the girl -- oh, I mean the boy -- oh, wait, I mean... uh... for.. uh... justice. Yeah, that's it, he's fighting for justice with his boyfriend... uh... I mean his companion".
One book I read a while ago handled "the gay issue" much better. There was a group of people on a ship/research station. One was gay, and liked to give blow jobs. Another guy was not gay, but liked getting blow jobs. No big deal, and no cause for fight for, just the way people are.
I voted for her last time. I don't keep up on these things, so didn't know if she is the candidate again this year.
When I told folks on another forum board who I voted for, the hard-core lefties couldn't believe that I voted for the same person they did. They thought our views were totally opposed.:^)
I didn't claim I was "well-oriented" on it. I said I read up on it long ago. As in, deeper than the talking points Alomex alluded to. But is it not worth wasting memory cells to keep it in mind, just to appease internet trolls like yourself.
I read up on Whitewater years ago, more than just the talking points. If you think the events around Whitewater are just "a lie big enough" you are the one harking to talking points.
So, I assume you never change the radio station while moving. Or take a drink of coffee/soda. Or speak to someone in the back seat.
Driving distracted is a fact of life on the road. If you can't drive safely while glancing at a phone, you can't drive safely while changing the AC controls either.
Personally, I'm fine with taking all distractions out of cars, literally. Just leave the steering wheel, pedals, and controls for lights, blinkers, and wipers. Remove everything else, so idiots like you will shut the hell up about "distracted driving", as if it was just invented at the same time as smartphones.
When we see a planet transit in front of its star, we see it on a path from one edge of the star to the other. For the Earth, your laser that simply points "away from the sun" would only hide our planet at one point on the path of its transit. And that only if the aliens were situated at a point that is on the plane of our orbit.
At the worst, Nova Express would simply have to explain that he meant "in all directions away from the sun at all times". Maybe he assumed readers would pick up on that limitation on their own.
Personally, I find that particular argument to be a wasteful distraction. I'm pro-Second Amendment, I learned the proper terminology while in the military, and I don't think it matters a bit in any discussion about guns or the rights we have. Might as well argue about the correct word to describe the liquid fuel used by automobiles and other vehicles.
You've never been to the inner cities where every drug dealer has a gun. For reference purposes, gun dealers are not generally considered to be in the "right" or "conservative" wing of American politics.
Sure, once you shut down all the media that are more than a manually operated printing press. And turn in your computer devices for FBI scrutiny. And arrest anyone who has ever been set free because their Miranda rights were not read to them off a cue card.
After all that, come back to me about a sentence that doesn't even have the words "gun" or "firearm" in it.
Slashdot Mirror
The only argument they have is "it's her body" and "republicans in our bedroom" and other meaningless drivel. They can't actually answer the hard questions.
I guess we draw the line at the level of complexity
I draw the line at "is anybody actually suffering ?" Well, baby itself doesn't care, and nobody else knows the baby. So, I think it's fair if we leave the decision to the mother.
A baby "doesn't care" an hour after its birth either. Are those ones still fair game?
And give us videos showing how mermaids evolved.
https://xkcd.com/1013/
Wait. You're waking them so they can read? I don't know if they will go along with that plan.
Do you mean the book or the movie of the same name?
That's why I stopped reading certain authors. Their books were "this poor guy is picked on because he's gay, and that's not fair, so let's make him the hero fighting for the girl -- oh, I mean the boy -- oh, wait, I mean ... uh ... for .. uh ... justice. Yeah, that's it, he's fighting for justice with his boyfriend ... uh ... I mean his companion".
One book I read a while ago handled "the gay issue" much better. There was a group of people on a ship/research station. One was gay, and liked to give blow jobs. Another guy was not gay, but liked getting blow jobs. No big deal, and no cause for fight for, just the way people are.
I voted for her last time. I don't keep up on these things, so didn't know if she is the candidate again this year.
When I told folks on another forum board who I voted for, the hard-core lefties couldn't believe that I voted for the same person they did. They thought our views were totally opposed. :^)
I didn't claim I was "well-oriented" on it. I said I read up on it long ago. As in, deeper than the talking points Alomex alluded to. But is it not worth wasting memory cells to keep it in mind, just to appease internet trolls like yourself.
I read up on Whitewater years ago, more than just the talking points. If you think the events around Whitewater are just "a lie big enough" you are the one harking to talking points.
Do you even know what Whitewater was?
It seems like the "true evil" was shoving millions of Jews into gas chambers and ovens.
So, I assume you never change the radio station while moving. Or take a drink of coffee/soda. Or speak to someone in the back seat.
Driving distracted is a fact of life on the road. If you can't drive safely while glancing at a phone, you can't drive safely while changing the AC controls either.
Personally, I'm fine with taking all distractions out of cars, literally. Just leave the steering wheel, pedals, and controls for lights, blinkers, and wipers. Remove everything else, so idiots like you will shut the hell up about "distracted driving", as if it was just invented at the same time as smartphones.
I look at my phone a lot while I'm driving. Since it has a GPS function, that isn't surprising. Nor is it illegal.
Facepalm yourself there.
When we see a planet transit in front of its star, we see it on a path from one edge of the star to the other. For the Earth, your laser that simply points "away from the sun" would only hide our planet at one point on the path of its transit. And that only if the aliens were situated at a point that is on the plane of our orbit.
At the worst, Nova Express would simply have to explain that he meant "in all directions away from the sun at all times". Maybe he assumed readers would pick up on that limitation on their own.
The KKK would be better called "Democrat Party Terrorists".
Haha! :^) Fair enough.
Personally, I find that particular argument to be a wasteful distraction. I'm pro-Second Amendment, I learned the proper terminology while in the military, and I don't think it matters a bit in any discussion about guns or the rights we have. Might as well argue about the correct word to describe the liquid fuel used by automobiles and other vehicles.
I wonder how the NRA and the Republicans would react if somebody bought 500.000 AK-47s
First, why choose the favorite weapon of the commies? Are you a commie? Damn pinko commies bringing commie guns to an American political event.
That's funny. I heard the same thing on right-wing talk radio. How is that possible?
Is that same someone also "allowing" you to post your gripes to slashdot?
Hmmm.
Laws vs the Constitution. Which one is supreme over the other?
You've never been to the inner cities where every drug dealer has a gun. For reference purposes, gun dealers are not generally considered to be in the "right" or "conservative" wing of American politics.
Sure, once you shut down all the media that are more than a manually operated printing press. And turn in your computer devices for FBI scrutiny. And arrest anyone who has ever been set free because their Miranda rights were not read to them off a cue card.
After all that, come back to me about a sentence that doesn't even have the words "gun" or "firearm" in it.
So, did you learn the difference?
Damn, I just used up all my mod points.
His screen is probably covered in dried spittle stains already. It is a holiday weekend after all. Makes the crazies even crazier for some reason.
That can be quite nasti.