I'm glad that judges are beginning to see the flimsiness of the cases brought to their courts by the RIAA and the rather lame methods they use to gather what they claim as "evidence." This will set a precedent for future cases that go to trial. I've noticed that many times judges wait to see what their legal counterparts will do before they decide themselves. All it takes is one judge to step up and make the call and others will soon begin to follow. I can only hope that MediaDefender will get pulled into this as well as being an accessory at some point.
I'm glad that judges are beginning to see the flimsiness of the cases brought to their courts by the RIAA and the rather lame methods they use to gather what they claim as "evidence." This will set a precedent for future cases that go to trial. I've noticed that many times judges wait to see what their legal counterparts will do before they decide themselves. All it takes is one judge to step up and make the call and others will soon begin to follow. I can only hope that MediaDefender will get pulled into this as well as being an accessory at some point.