We are using object-oriented databases like the ZODB for ten years when the data model is not relational oriented We are using relational databases when your data is relational We are using relational databases and object-oriented databases together in the same app when we need both We are not using MySQL when we are in need of a *real* database.
Use the right tool for each problem - only idiots use a RDBMS for all and everything.
An OSS project is only in danger if there is project is backed only by commercial companies. OSS projects driven by a community and backed by some foundation (e.g. Zope foundation, Plone foundation, Python foundation) are unlikely in such a danger.
would appreciate if Stallmann would just shut up. His penetrant narrow-mindedness about commercial software is just annoying. A solid mixture of open-source and properitary software is the solution. Not everything can be free, not everything must be free
Your article is of poor, poor quality. You are
comparing two completely different approaches.
So before writing such an article think about
WHAT you are writing
Slashdot Mirror
Plone is a Content Management System (CMS) written in Python programming language for the Zope 2 Web Application server.
Thanks! Now, what's "Zope 2"?
What is Google?
I call: bullshit
We are using object-oriented databases like the ZODB for ten years when the data model is not relational oriented
We are using relational databases when your data is relational
We are using relational databases and object-oriented databases together in the same app when we need both
We are not using MySQL when we are in need of a *real* database.
Use the right tool for each problem - only idiots use a RDBMS for all and everything.
An OSS project is only in danger if there is project is backed only by commercial companies. OSS projects driven by a community and backed by some foundation (e.g. Zope foundation, Plone foundation, Python foundation) are unlikely in such a danger.
would appreciate if Stallmann would just shut up.
His penetrant narrow-mindedness about commercial software is just annoying. A solid mixture of open-source and properitary software is the solution. Not everything can be free, not everything must be free
Your article is of poor, poor quality. You are
comparing two completely different approaches.
So before writing such an article think about
WHAT you are writing