Please share. I submitted a question to slashdot asking about recommendations for high end headphones for someone with a hearing disorder (severe tinnitus) and it got rejected.
It probably got rejected because you're a fucking retard if you want to use headphone while you already have a severe hearing disorder AND you want to overpay for the privilege.
DP is superior to HDMI. Yes, trash TVs have HDMI, but that doesn't change the fact that DP is the better choice every single time.
As for Thunderbolt 3 taking over everything? Intel can't let a spec sit still for more than 6 months. It would take 6 years minimum for OEMs to adopt Thunderbolt 3 on hosts and peripherals to the point that they feel safe using it as the primary connection for everything. And by then we'll have Thunderbolt 9 (still over copper instead of optical). And of course, there's no incentive for OEMs to do this - USB 3 is fine, DisplayPort 1.2a and 1.3 are fine, and Ethernet is fine. Thunderbolt simply costs way too much to implement (especially if you want to make a cable longer than a few feet). Daisy chaining shit is a novelty, and it's a novelty that's supported by USB, DisplayPort, etc. The mass market doesn't need 40 Gbps. The mass market hardly needs 10 Gbps of USB 3.1 for data or 32.whatever Gbps of video+audio+whatever of DP 1.3. Thunderbolt is FireWire all over again. Niche and expensive.
Any modern computers will not allow DMA access except for, you know, computers today that have Thunderbolt, FireWire, etc. http://www.breaknenter.org/pro...
As someone who spends a lot of time RTFMing (often on shit I have no intention of ever using), I'll say that MS's documentation shits all over the inconsistent hodge podge you get on the Linux side. Thorough, explicit, detailed.
Did you have a point? Or did you just want to point out that Molex is a company and the 4-pin molex connector (that doesn't even have a specific name for generic versions) is not the same thing as Molex the company?
If you absolutely need more than 2GB/s for your attached RAID/GPU then you will need an active Thunderbolt cable to reach 40Gbps.
No, if you want to use an external GPU or an external, high-speed disk [array], then you use external PCIe cables and bypass the thunderbolt layer bullshit entirely. My old external PCIe cables are rated for PCIe 2.0, but even that (64 Gbps after overhead) is more than Thunderbolt 3's theoretical max of 40 Gbps.
No it doesn't. HDMI audio capacity is X Mbps (depending on revision, whether or not you want to count the auxiliary/ethernet/ARC channels as "audio capacity", etc.). X is not infinite. HDMI has X more audio capacity than DVI.
Relatively speaking, HDMI has (X / 0) - 1 times more audio capacity than DVI. X / 0 is undefined. It is not infinite.
It can't be me because I never would have designed it to be reversible. I would have just told people to pay up for the keys after overwriting their files with random data. It's like half the work.
Wild, rampant, and baseless speculation. He could have found Jesus and decided to not be mean to people. He could have multiple personality disorder. He could be a dog with a computer randomly pawing at the keys.
Slashdot Mirror
Please share. I submitted a question to slashdot asking about recommendations for high end headphones for someone with a hearing disorder (severe tinnitus) and it got rejected.
It probably got rejected because you're a fucking retard if you want to use headphone while you already have a severe hearing disorder AND you want to overpay for the privilege.
DP is superior to HDMI. Yes, trash TVs have HDMI, but that doesn't change the fact that DP is the better choice every single time.
As for Thunderbolt 3 taking over everything? Intel can't let a spec sit still for more than 6 months. It would take 6 years minimum for OEMs to adopt Thunderbolt 3 on hosts and peripherals to the point that they feel safe using it as the primary connection for everything. And by then we'll have Thunderbolt 9 (still over copper instead of optical).
And of course, there's no incentive for OEMs to do this - USB 3 is fine, DisplayPort 1.2a and 1.3 are fine, and Ethernet is fine. Thunderbolt simply costs way too much to implement (especially if you want to make a cable longer than a few feet). Daisy chaining shit is a novelty, and it's a novelty that's supported by USB, DisplayPort, etc. The mass market doesn't need 40 Gbps. The mass market hardly needs 10 Gbps of USB 3.1 for data or 32.whatever Gbps of video+audio+whatever of DP 1.3.
Thunderbolt is FireWire all over again. Niche and expensive.
Any modern computers will not allow DMA access except for, you know, computers today that have Thunderbolt, FireWire, etc.
http://www.breaknenter.org/pro...
Beyond that, you can get a list of all the available commands and the number and types of parameters they take.
help copy
you Linux asspie
As someone who spends a lot of time RTFMing (often on shit I have no intention of ever using), I'll say that MS's documentation shits all over the inconsistent hodge podge you get on the Linux side. Thorough, explicit, detailed.
Did you have a point? Or did you just want to point out that Molex is a company and the 4-pin molex connector (that doesn't even have a specific name for generic versions) is not the same thing as Molex the company?
Ants.
Water bears.
Grass.
Mold.
We've tried and failed with several things, such as mosquitoes and rats.
Oh Batman, please tell me more about your NULL KEY ENCRYPTION.
If you absolutely need more than 2GB/s for your attached RAID/GPU then you will need an active Thunderbolt cable to reach 40Gbps.
No, if you want to use an external GPU or an external, high-speed disk [array], then you use external PCIe cables and bypass the thunderbolt layer bullshit entirely.
My old external PCIe cables are rated for PCIe 2.0, but even that (64 Gbps after overhead) is more than Thunderbolt 3's theoretical max of 40 Gbps.
The USB 3.0 cable in front of me is thinner (including outer insulation) than a single wire on a 4-pin molex connector in my desktop.
HDMI has infinitely more audio capacity than DVI.
No it doesn't.
HDMI audio capacity is X Mbps (depending on revision, whether or not you want to count the auxiliary/ethernet/ARC channels as "audio capacity", etc.).
X is not infinite. HDMI has X more audio capacity than DVI.
Relatively speaking, HDMI has (X / 0) - 1 times more audio capacity than DVI. X / 0 is undefined. It is not infinite.
You're basically plugging directly into your PCIe bus. It's fucking RETARDED security-wise.
Idiots are waiting for HDMI 2.0.
People with brains are waiting for DisplayPort 1.3.
You have evidently never hung out with sawfish. It's all they talk about.
humans can make ANYTHING go extinct
You greatly overestimate your species.
Your parents named you "shit Jim"?
It can't be me because I never would have designed it to be reversible. I would have just told people to pay up for the keys after overwriting their files with random data. It's like half the work.
The robots would rather kill everything.
Wild, rampant, and baseless speculation.
He could have found Jesus and decided to not be mean to people.
He could have multiple personality disorder.
He could be a dog with a computer randomly pawing at the keys.
I thought all Alaskans were owned by the Discovery channel and worked on reality shows.
At least they're not using UDP.
APPL was chosen for a different reason.
Agreed - apps are what you get at Chili's.
App the apps while apping apps!
What the fuck ever happened to "program", "application", "software", or "code"?
It's not a Silverlight limitation. Netflix limits the general web user to stereo for piracy concerns.