Slashdot Mirror


User: sexconker

sexconker's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
13,379
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 13,379

  1. Re:Wrong Summary! on Microsoft Changing Users' Default Search Engine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, we need FUD.
    Also, we need idiots who use the Google toolbar in Firefox, apparently. Who the fuck uses that with FF?

  2. Re:you're a fundamentalist on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe in the government not encroaching on the rights I am supposed to have.

    It's not a convenient way to do anything.

    I'd wager the restriction of speech and the erosion of people's right in this country has done far more to "create more suffering" than anything I have or ever will do.

  3. Re:RTFA on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    Probably not, but you COULD waste tons more money and lives on another bungled effort.

  4. Re:Serves you right! on DOJ Confirms Google Antitrust Investigation · · Score: 0, Troll

    What part of MS locked me in?
    Let's see, I could use any browser or search engine or media player or OS I wanted.

    Won't even respond to anything else, your agenda is clear.

    You can shit on MS all you want, and for many things I'd agree with you, but to say Google is any different is naive at best.

  5. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    When administered properly and completely to a properly educated populace, yes.

    There's a place where that's a huge fucking task.

  6. Re:Serves you right! on DOJ Confirms Google Antitrust Investigation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yup. I also think the shit they pulled against MS was overzealous.

  7. Re:say i develop a strange fascination about you on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: 1

    (It won't be treated as such in the courts, but ALL speech is protected in the US, fuck anything anyone else says. Take the below as a "how it SHOULD be".)

    It's protected speech.

    However, expect to get investigated for it.

    Expect to be imprisoned if it's determined you are planning to carry it out.

    Expect a restraining order otherwise, and to be jailed for breaking it when you continue.

    Expect to be sued for mental distress.

    No one will prevent you from doing the same in the future.
    No one will imprison you for being a dick.
    No one will say "you can't sue a computer for 8 years".

  8. Re:can you shout fire in a crowded theatre? on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nothing you say should EVER get you IMPRISONED.
    NOTHING.

    NO ONE should EVER attempt to restrict your RIGHT to say what you want.

    You SHOULD be sued for demonstrable damages that occurred as a direct result of your speech.

    You SHOULD be investigated for making threats.

    You SHOULD be monitored for encouraging protesters to get violent.

    In this case, the family should sue her for every cent she has, as it's fucking simple to show that her speech was both a direct and major contributor to their daughter's suicide.

    I don't care if someone goes around yelling out nuclear launch codes. In order for that right to mean anything it, like all RIGHTS, must be universal.

  9. Re:They should have found a more appropriate charg on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: -1, Troll

    "Judges HATE setting precedents"

    Sotomayor says hi.

  10. Re:first post on Judge Tentatively Dismisses Case Against Lori Drew · · Score: 1

    Daft...Punks...

  11. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    No one in the US maybe.
    There's a place where this confusion might cause actual problems, though.

  12. Re:Alcohol on FDA Considers Banning Acetaminophen-Based Pain Killers · · Score: 1

    Funny, I don't recall there being a warning label on alcohol regarding the daily recommended dose.

  13. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    I rarely see the media talk about HIV anymore, actually, they usually just call it AIDS.

  14. Re:RTFA on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it isn't, but it IS safe to assume that YOU are ignorant of the situation in Africa.

    A lot of people there ACTUALLY BELIEVE having sex with a virgin will cure you. Or that you're supposed to cut the tip off of the condom.

    Education has to be the priority there.

  15. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Did anyone read my post, or my own reply?
    No, guess not.
    And no one will read this.

    I KNOW THAT THIS IS FOR HIV.
    MY BEEF IS THE USE OF "HIV/AIDS" IN THE HEADLINE.

  16. Re:RTFA on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    Obviously.
    The point is that saying HIV/AIDS in headlines is stupid.
    This is a vaccine for HIV.

    Fast forward to when we're passing it out like candy in Africa.

    People who already have AIDS will get it, and with a lack of good information (such as the headline's "HIV/AIDS"), people will think they're cured, that they can't pass it on, etc.

  17. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 1

    No I'm not.
    Are you trying to promote that they are the same thing?

  18. Re:Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 0

    Just to clarify, I'm not confused about it.
    Others will be with headlines like that.

  19. Which is It? on HIV/AIDS Vaccine To Begin Phase I Human Trials · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this a vaccine for the virus, as one with half a brain would assume?

    Or is this a magic serum that cures you of AIDS while not dealing with HIV?

    HIV/AIDS is stupid.
    HIV and AIDS are separate, though related, things.

    Think of the confusion:
    Person with AIDS gets vaccine and thinks it's okay to have unprotected sex willy-nilly.

  20. Re:Role Playing on The Essentials of RPG Design · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hence the "nothing at all".

  21. Re: Cabin in the woods on BD+ Resealed Once Again · · Score: 1

    I already bought it, dipshit.
    It's still considered the best Bluray player on the market.
    Oh, and guess what, it plays games, runs Linux, and does all sorts of shit I'll never even need.

    Oh, and it's been updated time and time again.
    Oh, and it's the fucking player that made Bluray win the "format war".
    Oh, and it's from Sony, the fuckers behind Bluray.

    Yeah, I'm confident that support will be there far longer than I need it to be.

    Nazi ass?
    Wow, we've got a special kind of retard in ae1294.

  22. Re:YOU FORGOT THE MAGIC on The Essentials of RPG Design · · Score: 1

    Seems like you didn't forget the fail, though, NUMBER 2!

  23. Role Playing on The Essentials of RPG Design · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Real men role play with pencil and paper, or nothing at all.

  24. Re:We 3 Tuna on Japanese Creating "Super Tuna" · · Score: 1

    Is that anything like We 3 Kings?
    (Hint: &lt; yields <)
    (Super Hint: &amp;lt; yields &lt;)

  25. Alcohol on FDA Considers Banning Acetaminophen-Based Pain Killers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So when will the FDA ban alcohol for destroying people's livers?